Classroom Observation - PSYCHOLOGY WIKI

Classroom observation, a cornerstone of school psychology, offers vital insights into student experiences. This article explores its historical roots, theoretical foundations, methods, and applications. Classroom observation’s role in assessment and intervention, benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations are discussed. Emerging trends and technological advancements underscore its continued relevance in school psychology.

Introduction

Definition and Significance of Classroom Observation in School Psychology

Classroom observation, a core practice in the field of school psychology, encompasses the systematic and structured process of gathering information about students, teachers, and the learning environment within classrooms. This process involves the careful and objective examination of various aspects of classroom dynamics, including instructional strategies, student behavior, teacher-student interactions, and the overall classroom atmosphere. The significance of classroom observation lies in its pivotal role in enhancing the understanding of student learning, informing instructional practices, and facilitating evidence-based decision-making in schools.

Classroom observation serves a multitude of purposes in school psychology. It enables school psychologists to gain valuable insights into students’ academic and social-emotional functioning, identifying their strengths and areas of need. Additionally, it provides a means to assess the effectiveness of instructional strategies and interventions, helping educators tailor their approaches to better meet students’ diverse needs. Moreover, classroom observation plays a crucial role in promoting positive classroom climates and fostering inclusive educational environments. By examining teacher-student interactions and classroom dynamics, school psychologists can contribute to the creation of supportive learning environments that enhance student engagement and success.

Historical Context: Evolution and Development of Classroom Observation

The practice of classroom observation has evolved over time, shaped by advances in psychology, education, and assessment. Its historical development can be traced back to the early 20th century when educational psychology emerged as a distinct field. During this period, psychologists like Edward Thorndike and John Dewey laid the foundation for understanding the importance of observation in education.

One of the notable milestones in the evolution of classroom observation was the advent of systematic observational research in the mid-20th century. Researchers like Robert Gagne and Benjamin Bloom pioneered efforts to develop taxonomies and frameworks for categorizing classroom behaviors and instructional strategies. This development laid the groundwork for more structured and comprehensive approaches to classroom observation.

Over the decades, classroom observation techniques have continued to evolve, incorporating technological advancements and drawing from various psychological theories and models. The integration of video recording and digital tools has facilitated more accurate and objective observations. Furthermore, the influence of educational theories, such as constructivism and socio-cultural learning, has enriched the conceptualization of classroom observation, emphasizing the importance of context and social interaction.

Overview of the Article’s Objectives and Structure

This article aims to provide a comprehensive exploration of classroom observation in school psychology. It is organized into several sections to facilitate a thorough understanding of the topic. The subsequent sections will delve into the theoretical frameworks underpinning classroom observation, the diverse methods and techniques employed, its applications and benefits, the challenges and ethical considerations inherent in the practice, and emerging trends shaping its future. By examining these facets, this article seeks to underscore the enduring significance of classroom observation in enhancing student learning experiences and supporting educators in their pedagogical endeavors.

Theoretical Frameworks in Classroom Observation

Explanation of Major Psychological Theories and Models Used in Classroom Observation

Classroom observation is informed by a range of psychological theories and models, each offering unique perspectives on student learning, behavior, and development. Understanding these theories is essential for school psychologists conducting classroom observations, as they guide the selection of observation methods and the interpretation of observed behaviors. Below are some major psychological theories and models commonly used in classroom observation:

Behaviorism: Behaviorism, rooted in the work of John B. Watson and B.F. Skinner, emphasizes observable behaviors as the primary focus of study. In classroom observation, behaviorist principles are employed to analyze specific behaviors, their antecedents, and consequences. Observers use behaviorist models to identify and measure observable behaviors, such as on-task behavior, participation, and compliance with classroom rules.
Social Learning Theory: Developed by Albert Bandura, social learning theory emphasizes the importance of social interactions and modeling in learning. In classroom observation, this theory informs the examination of peer interactions, cooperative learning, and the influence of teacher modeling on students’ behavior. Observers assess how students acquire new behaviors through observation and imitation.
Cognitive Developmental Theory: Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory focuses on the stages of intellectual development in children. Classroom observation influenced by this theory explores students’ cognitive processes, problem-solving abilities, and their readiness for particular types of instruction. Observers look for evidence of cognitive growth and the level of cognitive development exhibited in classroom tasks.
Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory: Lev Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory highlights the role of social interactions and cultural contexts in cognitive development. In classroom observation, this theory informs the analysis of collaborative learning, teacher-student scaffolding, and the ways in which cultural factors influence learning. Observers assess how students engage in culturally situated learning activities.
Self-Determination Theory: Developed by Deci and Ryan, self-determination theory focuses on intrinsic motivation and the fulfillment of psychological needs. Classroom observation informed by this theory examines students’ levels of engagement, autonomy, and the extent to which they experience motivation and self-regulation in the learning process.

Discussion of How These Theories Inform Classroom Observation Practices

These psychological theories and models inform classroom observation practices in several key ways:

Selection of Observation Focus: The choice of what to observe in the classroom is influenced by the theoretical framework guiding the observation. For example, behaviorist theories may lead observers to focus on specific behaviors, while cognitive developmental theories may emphasize cognitive processes and problem-solving.
Data Collection Methods: The selection of observation methods and tools is influenced by the theoretical perspective. Behaviorist theories often utilize structured checklists and frequency counts, while sociocultural theories may employ narrative descriptions and context-rich observations to capture social interactions.
Interpretation of Observations: Observers draw upon these theories to interpret their findings. For instance, a behaviorist observer might interpret a student’s disruptive behavior as a response to a lack of attention, while a sociocultural observer might view it as a form of peer interaction.
Intervention and Recommendations: Theoretical frameworks guide the development of interventions and recommendations based on the observations. For instance, a classroom intervention informed by self-determination theory might focus on enhancing students’ intrinsic motivation by providing opportunities for autonomy and choice.

In summary, the selection and application of psychological theories and models in classroom observation are essential for understanding student behavior and learning in a comprehensive manner. These theories provide a lens through which observers can interpret and make meaningful recommendations based on their observations, ultimately contributing to the improvement of teaching and learning practices.

Methods and Techniques of Classroom Observation

Overview of Various Observation Methods Used in School Psychology

Classroom observation is a fundamental tool in school psychology, enabling professionals to gain insights into student behavior, teacher practices, and the overall learning environment. Various observation methods are employed to collect data and inform educational decisions. Here, we provide an overview of some commonly used observation methods:

Direct Observation: Direct observation involves the systematic and objective monitoring of student and teacher behaviors in real-time. School psychologists physically observe the classroom environment, taking note of behaviors, interactions, and instructional strategies. This method allows for the collection of rich, firsthand data.
Time Sampling: Time sampling is a method of capturing observations at specific time intervals. Observers may record behaviors at predetermined intervals (e.g., every 2 minutes) or during selected segments of a lesson. Time sampling provides a structured approach to gathering data without the need for continuous observation.
Event Sampling: Event sampling focuses on specific target behaviors or events. Observers are trained to document occurrences of particular behaviors, such as instances of on-task behavior, disruptive behavior, or teacher praise. This method is valuable for assessing the frequency and patterns of specific behaviors.
Structured Observations: Structured observations involve the use of pre-designed checklists, rating scales, or rubrics to assess classroom activities. Observers follow a predetermined set of criteria to evaluate teaching practices, student engagement, or specific skills. Structured observations provide a standardized framework for assessment.

Detailed Explanation of Techniques

Direct Observation: Direct observation is conducted by school psychologists who physically enter the classroom and use their senses to collect data. They carefully document behaviors, interactions, and environmental factors. This method provides a holistic view of the classroom environment.
Time Sampling: Time sampling involves dividing the observation period into intervals, with observers recording behaviors during each interval. For example, if observing a student’s engagement in a 30-minute lesson, observers might record the student’s behavior every 2 minutes. This method is efficient for assessing the frequency of behaviors over time.
Event Sampling: Event sampling focuses on specific behaviors or events of interest. Observers are trained to recognize and record occurrences of particular behaviors, such as instances of aggression, peer interactions, or teacher praise. This method allows for in-depth analysis of target behaviors.
Structured Observations: Structured observations use predetermined criteria and rating scales to assess classroom practices. For example, an observer might use a rubric to evaluate teacher-student interactions, with categories like “clear communication” or “student engagement.” This structured approach enhances objectivity and consistency.

Discussion of the Use of Technology in Classroom Observation

Advancements in technology have significantly influenced classroom observation practices. School psychologists now have access to various tools and software that enhance the efficiency and accuracy of observations:

Video Recording: Video cameras are commonly used to record classroom sessions. This technology allows for detailed reviews of interactions, behaviors, and instructional methods. It also enables observers to focus on specific aspects during post-observation analysis.
Audio Recording: Audio recording captures verbal interactions and conversations in the classroom. This can be valuable for assessing language development, teacher-student communication, and classroom discourse.
Digital Apps and Software: There are numerous digital apps and software designed for classroom observation. These tools often include features for creating checklists, recording observations, and generating reports. They streamline the data collection and analysis process.
Online Surveys and Questionnaires: Online surveys and questionnaires can be administered to teachers, students, and parents to gather information about classroom experiences. This complements direct observation data with subjective perspectives.
Data Analysis Software: Statistical software packages help school psychologists analyze observational data more efficiently. They allow for the identification of trends, patterns, and statistical significance in observed behaviors.

The integration of technology in classroom observation not only enhances data collection but also supports the visualization and interpretation of findings. School psychologists can use technology-driven tools to generate reports, share results with stakeholders, and make data-informed decisions to improve teaching and learning practices.

Application and Benefits of Classroom Observation

How Classroom Observation Contributes to Assessment and Intervention in School Psychology

Classroom observation plays a pivotal role in the assessment and intervention processes within the field of school psychology. It serves as a dynamic tool for gathering valuable data that informs decision-making and supports students’ academic, social, and emotional development. Here, we explore how classroom observation contributes to these essential aspects of school psychology practice:

Assessment of Student Behavior: Classroom observation allows school psychologists to assess a wide range of student behaviors, both in terms of frequency and quality. By systematically documenting behaviors such as on-task engagement, disruptive conduct, or social interactions, professionals can gain insights into individual students’ strengths and challenges.
Identification of Learning Disabilities: Observational data can be instrumental in identifying learning disabilities and other exceptionalities. For example, consistent observations of a student’s struggles with reading comprehension or attention span may prompt further assessment and intervention for a potential learning disorder.
Development of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs): In the context of special education, classroom observations contribute to the development and refinement of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). Observations help determine students’ unique needs, set appropriate goals, and select effective strategies and accommodations.
Assessment of Classroom Environment: Classroom observations extend beyond individual students to evaluate the overall classroom environment. School psychologists can assess teaching practices, classroom management techniques, and the level of support provided to students. This assessment informs recommendations for creating an inclusive and supportive learning atmosphere.
Support for Evidence-Based Practices: Observations provide empirical evidence that can validate or refine instructional and behavioral interventions. By systematically tracking the effectiveness of specific strategies, school psychologists can promote evidence-based practices that enhance student outcomes.

Examination of How Teachers and Students Can Benefit from Classroom Observation

Classroom observation benefits not only school psychologists but also teachers and students. It fosters professional growth and positively impacts educational outcomes. Let’s explore the advantages for these key stakeholders:

Benefits for Teachers:

Professional Development: Classroom observation offers teachers the opportunity for ongoing professional development. Feedback and insights from school psychologists or peers can help educators refine their instructional techniques, classroom management skills, and individualized support for students.
Data-Informed Instruction: Observational data provides teachers with concrete evidence of what is happening in their classrooms. This information enables educators to make data-informed decisions about curriculum adjustments, teaching strategies, and intervention plans tailored to students’ needs.
Support for Differentiated Instruction: Observations can reveal variations in student learning styles and needs. Armed with this knowledge, teachers can implement differentiated instruction, tailoring their approach to meet diverse learning preferences and abilities.

Benefits for Students:

Individualized Support: Classroom observations contribute to the development of individualized support plans for students with unique learning needs. This can include targeted interventions, accommodations, and modifications that enhance learning experiences.
Enhanced Engagement: When educators use observational data to refine their teaching practices, students are more likely to be engaged in the learning process. Effective instructional strategies and a supportive classroom environment foster a positive and motivating atmosphere.
Early Intervention: For students who may be struggling academically or behaviorally, classroom observation can trigger early intervention. Identifying challenges promptly allows for timely support and prevents academic setbacks.

Discussion of Evidence-Based Practices in Classroom Observation

To ensure the effectiveness and reliability of classroom observation, school psychologists follow evidence-based practices in their observation processes. These practices promote consistency, validity, and ethical conduct. Key components of evidence-based classroom observation include:

Standardized Procedures: Observations are conducted using standardized procedures, ensuring consistency across different observers and classrooms. This includes clear guidelines for data collection, recording, and reporting.
Training and Calibration: Observers receive training to ensure they understand the purpose of the observation, the behaviors of interest, and the data collection methods. Regular calibration sessions help maintain interobserver reliability.
Objective Data Collection: Observational data is collected objectively, focusing on observable behaviors rather than interpretations or assumptions. This minimizes subjectivity and enhances the validity of the findings.
Data Analysis: Observational data is subjected to rigorous data analysis, which may include quantitative methods such as frequency counts and qualitative analysis to identify patterns and trends.
Feedback and Collaboration: School psychologists collaborate with educators to provide constructive feedback based on the observational data. This feedback informs professional development plans and interventions.
Ethical Considerations: Ethical guidelines, including informed consent and privacy protections, are strictly adhered to during classroom observation. The well-being and rights of students and teachers are paramount.

By adhering to evidence-based practices, classroom observation remains a reliable and valuable tool in school psychology. It ensures that observations are conducted ethically, contribute to informed decision-making, and ultimately improve educational outcomes for students.

Challenges, Ethical Considerations, and Future Trends

Challenges and Limitations of Classroom Observation in School Psychology

While classroom observation is a valuable tool in school psychology, it is not without challenges and limitations. Understanding these issues is crucial for practitioners to conduct meaningful and ethical observations:

Observer Bias: One of the primary challenges is observer bias. Observers may unintentionally interpret behaviors through their own lens, leading to subjectivity in data collection. This bias can affect the reliability and validity of observations.
Limited Time and Resources: School psychologists often face constraints in terms of time and resources. Conducting thorough and frequent observations for all students can be logistically challenging, limiting the comprehensiveness of assessments.
Student Self-Presentation: Students may alter their behavior when they are aware of being observed, a phenomenon known as the Hawthorne effect. This can lead to inaccurate representations of their typical conduct.
Interobserver Reliability: Achieving and maintaining interobserver reliability among different observers can be difficult. Variability in interpretation and data collection methods can impact the consistency of observations.
Contextual Factors: Classroom dynamics and teaching styles can vary widely. Observations may not capture the full context of learning environments, potentially missing important contributing factors.
Complex Behaviors: Some behaviors, especially those related to social and emotional development, can be challenging to observe and quantify accurately. Complex behaviors may require additional assessment methods.
Privacy Concerns: Balancing the need for observation with privacy concerns can be a delicate matter. Maintaining the confidentiality and dignity of students and teachers is paramount.

Ethical Guidelines and Potential Biases in Classroom Observation

Ethical considerations are essential in classroom observation to protect the rights and well-being of students and teachers. School psychologists adhere to ethical guidelines, such as those established by the American Psychological Association (APA). Some key ethical principles and potential biases to be mindful of include:

Informed Consent: Obtaining informed consent from both teachers and students (or their legal guardians) is a fundamental ethical requirement. Participants should fully understand the purpose and procedures of the observation.
Confidentiality: Protecting the privacy and confidentiality of individuals observed is crucial. School psychologists must ensure that observational data is handled discreetly and shared only with authorized parties.
Cultural Sensitivity: Observers should be culturally sensitive and avoid making assumptions or judgments based on cultural differences. Cultural biases can distort observations and lead to misinterpretations.
Observer Neutrality: Observers should strive for neutrality and objectivity. Recognizing and minimizing personal biases and preconceptions is essential for accurate data collection.
Respect for Autonomy: Respecting the autonomy of students and teachers means allowing them to express their thoughts, feelings, and opinions without undue influence from observers.
Feedback and Debriefing: After observations, providing constructive feedback and debriefing sessions can help participants understand the purpose and outcomes of the observation, reducing potential stress or anxiety.
Use of Technology: When using technology for observations, ethical guidelines regarding data security, consent for recording, and video storage must be followed diligently.

Emerging Trends and the Future of Classroom Observation

The future of classroom observation in school psychology is influenced by emerging trends and advancements in technology and research. Several noteworthy developments are shaping the landscape:

Technology Integration: Technology, such as video recording and data analytics, is becoming increasingly integrated into classroom observation. This allows for more comprehensive and precise data collection and analysis.
Real-time Data: With the use of mobile applications and digital platforms, observers can collect and analyze data in real time. This facilitates immediate feedback and decision-making.
Big Data and Machine Learning: Advances in big data analytics and machine learning are enabling the analysis of vast datasets from observations. This can reveal patterns and insights that were previously challenging to detect.
Remote Observation: Remote observation, facilitated by video conferencing and remote learning platforms, has become more prevalent. It offers opportunities to observe students in diverse settings, including virtual classrooms.
Culturally Responsive Observation: A growing emphasis on cultural competence and equity is influencing observation practices. Observers are encouraged to consider cultural factors and adapt their methods accordingly.
Multi-Method Approaches: Observations are increasingly being combined with other assessment methods, such as surveys, interviews, and standardized tests, to provide a more holistic understanding of student behavior and learning.
Professional Development: Observations are being used not only for assessment but also for ongoing professional development. Teachers can benefit from personalized feedback and coaching based on observations.

In conclusion, classroom observation in school psychology is a dynamic field that continues to evolve. Despite its challenges and ethical considerations, it remains a valuable tool for assessing and supporting students’ academic, social, and emotional development. Emerging trends, driven by technology and a focus on equity, are shaping the future of classroom observation, ensuring that it remains a relevant and effective practice in the field of school psychology.

Conclusion

Summarization of Key Points

In this comprehensive exploration of classroom observation in school psychology, we have delved into its definition, historical context, theoretical foundations, methods, applications, benefits, challenges, ethical considerations, and future trends. The key takeaways from this discussion can be summarized as follows:

Definition and Significance: Classroom observation in school psychology is the systematic process of gathering data on students’ behavior, interactions, and learning experiences within educational settings. It serves as a fundamental tool for understanding, assessing, and supporting students’ academic, social, and emotional development.
Historical Context: The practice of classroom observation has evolved over time, from rudimentary methods to more sophisticated and technology-driven approaches. Its roots can be traced back to early educational psychology and behaviorism.
Theoretical Frameworks: Classroom observation is informed by various psychological theories and models, including behaviorism, social learning theory, ecological systems theory, and cognitive-behavioral theory. These frameworks guide the selection of observation methods and the interpretation of data.
Methods and Techniques: School psychologists employ a range of observation methods, such as direct observation, time sampling, event sampling, and structured observations. The integration of technology, including video recording and real-time data collection, has enhanced the precision and efficiency of observations.
Application and Benefits: Classroom observation contributes significantly to assessment, intervention, and evidence-based practices in school psychology. It offers insights into students’ strengths, needs, and progress, guiding instructional decisions and support services. Teachers and students alike benefit from targeted feedback and tailored interventions.
Challenges and Ethical Considerations: While valuable, classroom observation presents challenges related to observer bias, resource limitations, student self-presentation, and privacy concerns. Ethical guidelines, including informed consent, confidentiality, and cultural sensitivity, are essential to maintain the integrity of the process.
Future Trends: The future of classroom observation is shaped by emerging trends, including technology integration, real-time data analysis, big data, remote observation, and a focus on cultural competence. These trends reflect a commitment to improving the practice’s effectiveness and equity.

Emphasis on Continued Significance and Relevance

Classroom observation remains a cornerstone of school psychology practice, playing a pivotal role in enhancing student outcomes and educational environments. Its continued significance is underscored by several factors:

Data-Driven Decision-Making: In an era characterized by data-driven decision-making, classroom observation offers a wealth of valuable information. It provides school psychologists with rich, context-specific data that inform individualized interventions, instructional strategies, and support services.
Holistic Assessment: Classroom observation complements other assessment methods, enabling a more holistic understanding of students’ academic, social, and emotional development. This comprehensive view is instrumental in tailoring interventions to meet diverse student needs.
Equity and Inclusion: The growing emphasis on equity and inclusion in education highlights the importance of classroom observation. It enables school psychologists to identify disparities, assess the effectiveness of inclusive practices, and advocate for the rights of all students, including those with disabilities and from culturally diverse backgrounds.
Professional Growth: Classroom observation is not limited to assessing students; it also supports the professional growth of educators. Teachers benefit from constructive feedback, coaching, and opportunities for ongoing development, fostering a culture of continuous improvement.
Technological Advancements: The integration of technology and data analytics is propelling classroom observation into a new era. Real-time data collection, video analysis, and machine learning offer unprecedented opportunities for in-depth insights and evidence-based practices.
Cultural Competence: As educational settings become increasingly diverse, classroom observation practices are evolving to incorporate cultural competence. Observers are encouraged to consider cultural factors, language diversity, and the unique needs of students from various backgrounds.

In conclusion, classroom observation in school psychology remains a dynamic and essential practice. Its enduring significance lies in its ability to provide valuable insights, inform interventions, support professional growth, promote equity, and adapt to the evolving landscape of education. As technology and research continue to shape the field, classroom observation stands as a steadfast tool for improving the educational experiences and outcomes of students. Its future promises further innovation and effectiveness in the service of education and student well-being.

References:

Anderson, C. A., & Dill, K. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 772-790.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513-531.
Buysse, V., & Wesley, P. W. (2006). Evidence-based practice in the early childhood field. Zero to Three, 26(4), 13-19.
Cappella, E., Kim, H. S., Neal, J. W., & Jackson, D. R. (2013). Classroom processes and student engagement: An observational study of three elementary classrooms in the United States. The Elementary School Journal, 113(3), 372-393.
Cook-Cottone, C. P. (2004). Childhood obesity, cognitive therapy, and the ethics of BMI report cards. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 11(3), 324-328.
Cowan, R. J., & Goldiamond, I. (1963). Social reinforcement, verbal conditioning, and pseudo-verbalization in the verbal conditioning of children. Child Development, 34(3), 625-636.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2014). Beyond basic skills: The role of performance assessment in achieving 21st century standards of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(4), 8-13.
Heward, W. L. (2013). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education. Pearson.
Irvin, L. K., Horner, R. H., Ingram, K., Todd, A. W., Sugai, G., Sampson, N. K., … & Long, JD (2006). Using office discipline referral data for decision making about student behavior in elementary and middle schools: An empirical investigation of validity. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(1), 10-23.
Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD.
Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.
O’Donnell, A. M., & King, A. (1999). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Routledge.
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109-119.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.
Popham, W. J. (2007). Instructional assessment: A guide for teachers and principals. Pearson.
Rubie-Davies, C. M., & Peterson, E. R. (2011). Developing classroom observation measures: Assessing the validity of the OTI. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 1029-1043.
Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice. Allyn & Bacon.
Taylor, J. E., Ziegler, A., & Lamorey, S. (2019). Developing an observation-based classroom discipline index for primary grade teachers. Educational Psychology, 25(2), 191-203.
Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178.
Weinstein, C. S. (2018). Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Wentzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (1998). Academic and social motivational influences on students’ academic performance. Educational Psychology, 33(2-3), 77-85.
Woolfolk, A. (2018). Educational psychology. Pearson.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Routledge.