Curriculum-Based Assessment

Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) stands as a cornerstone of modern educational practices in school psychology, enabling professionals to evaluate and support student learning effectively. This article delves into the significance of CBA within the field, tracing its historical evolution and highlighting its theoretical foundations. It also provides a comprehensive overview of the methods and techniques employed in CBA, including the integration of technology. Furthermore, the article explores the manifold applications and benefits of CBA, from enhancing student learning to shaping individualized education programs. Despite its merits, CBA is not without challenges and ethical considerations, and this article delves into these aspects. Lastly, it explores emerging trends and the future landscape of curriculum-based assessment, emphasizing its continued importance in school psychology.

Introduction

Definition and Significance of Curriculum-Based Assessment in School Psychology

Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) in school psychology is a systematic and dynamic approach used to assess a student’s performance and progress within the context of their classroom curriculum. Unlike traditional assessment methods that often involve standardized tests, CBA focuses on evaluating a student’s ability to master specific content and skills aligned with their grade-level curriculum. It plays a pivotal role in school psychology by providing educators and practitioners with valuable insights into a student’s academic strengths and weaknesses, helping to guide instructional decisions, identify areas that need improvement, and tailor interventions to individual student needs.

CBA is significant in school psychology for several reasons. Firstly, it aligns assessment with the curriculum, making it highly relevant to the educational goals of students. It offers a direct link between assessment and instruction, allowing educators and school psychologists to assess how well students are meeting the curriculum’s objectives and adjust teaching methods accordingly. Secondly, CBA provides a versatile tool for monitoring progress over time, allowing professionals to track a student’s growth and adapt interventions as needed. This continuous assessment approach is especially crucial for students with learning disabilities or those who require additional support. Finally, CBA is an essential component in the development and implementation of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), enabling school psychologists to create tailored educational plans that meet the unique needs of students with disabilities.

Historical Context: Evolution and Development of Curriculum-Based Assessment

The roots of Curriculum-Based Assessment can be traced back to the educational reforms of the mid-20th century. During this period, there was a growing recognition of the need to shift educational assessment away from a purely summative and standardized approach towards more formative and curriculum-embedded methods. The work of educational psychologists like Benjamin Bloom and Ralph Tyler played a pivotal role in shaping the concept of aligning assessment with curriculum objectives.

The 1970s witnessed the emergence of CBA as a distinct assessment approach, thanks to the pioneering work of Mark R. Shinn and Stanley L. Deno. Shinn and Deno emphasized the importance of monitoring students’ progress within the context of the curriculum they were exposed to daily. This shift in perspective marked a departure from traditional assessment practices, which often relied on externally developed standardized tests. Instead, CBA aimed to assess what students were taught and expected to learn in their classrooms.

Over the decades, CBA has evolved and matured, with numerous research studies and best practices emerging. It has become a fundamental tool in the toolkit of school psychologists, educators, and special education professionals, enabling them to make data-driven decisions, support struggling students effectively, and promote inclusive and equitable educational practices.

Overview of the Article’s Objectives and Structure

This article aims to provide a comprehensive exploration of Curriculum-Based Assessment in school psychology. It will be structured into several sections to facilitate a detailed examination of CBA’s definition, historical development, theoretical foundations, methods and techniques, applications and benefits, challenges and ethical considerations, and future trends. By the end of this article, readers will have a thorough understanding of CBA’s significance in school psychology and its role in shaping the educational experiences of students.

Theoretical Frameworks in Curriculum-Based Assessment

Explanation of Curriculum-Based Assessment

Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) is a formative and dynamic approach to educational assessment that focuses on evaluating a student’s performance and progress within the context of their daily classroom curriculum. Unlike traditional assessments that rely on externally developed standardized tests, CBA is closely aligned with the content, objectives, and teaching practices used in the classroom. It serves as a vital tool for school psychologists and educators in understanding how well students are mastering the curriculum and helps guide instructional decision-making.

Theoretical Foundations Underlying Curriculum-Based Assessment

Several theoretical frameworks underpin the practice of Curriculum-Based Assessment. These theories inform assessment practices and guide educators and school psychologists in the effective implementation of CBA.

Behaviorist Learning Theory: Behaviorism, rooted in the work of B.F. Skinner, emphasizes observable behaviors and the impact of the environment on learning. In CBA, behaviorist principles are applied to assess a student’s ability to demonstrate specific skills and knowledge acquired through instruction. The focus is on assessing what a student can do, which is aligned with behaviorist principles of observable outcomes.
Constructivist Learning Theory: Constructivism, as advocated by Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky, posits that learning is an active process in which students construct knowledge through their experiences and interactions. In CBA, this theory is reflected in the assessment of a student’s ability to apply knowledge and skills in meaningful contexts. Assessments often involve real-world problems or tasks that require students to apply what they have learned.
Socio-Cultural Theory: Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory highlights the role of social interaction and cultural context in learning. In CBA, socio-cultural theory is considered when assessing students from diverse backgrounds and linguistic abilities. It recognizes that cultural factors can influence a student’s performance and learning, and assessments should be culturally responsive.
Information Processing Theory: This theory, rooted in cognitive psychology, focuses on how individuals process and store information. In CBA, assessments may include tasks that tap into various cognitive processes, such as memory, attention, problem-solving, and decision-making. Understanding a student’s cognitive processes can help identify areas of strength and weakness.

How These Theories Inform Assessment Practices

These theoretical foundations inform assessment practices in CBA in several ways:

Alignment with Classroom Instruction: CBA assessments are designed to align closely with what is taught in the classroom. This alignment ensures that assessments reflect the curriculum’s objectives and content, making them highly relevant to the learning process.
Focus on Mastery and Application: CBA assesses a student’s ability to master specific content and apply it in practical situations. This focus on mastery and application is consistent with constructivist and socio-cultural theories, emphasizing meaningful learning experiences.
Individualized Assessment: CBA recognizes that students learn at different paces and have unique needs. It allows for individualized assessment, where students’ progress is tracked based on their specific learning goals and abilities.
Real-World Relevance: Assessments in CBA often involve real-world problems or tasks that mirror the application of knowledge and skills in authentic situations. This approach is influenced by both constructivist and information processing theories, emphasizing the practical application of learning.
Cultural Responsiveness: Informed by socio-cultural theory, CBA acknowledges the influence of culture on learning. Assessments are designed to be culturally responsive, considering the cultural backgrounds and experiences of diverse student populations.

By drawing on these theoretical frameworks, Curriculum-Based Assessment in school psychology not only provides a comprehensive picture of a student’s academic abilities but also informs instructional decisions that cater to individual learning needs and styles. These theoretical foundations enrich assessment practices and contribute to the overall effectiveness of CBA in supporting student learning and development.

Methods and Implementation of Curriculum-Based Assessment

Overview of Curriculum-Based Assessment Methods

Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) encompasses a variety of methods and techniques that are tailored to assess a student’s progress within the context of their daily curriculum. These methods are designed to provide educators and school psychologists with insights into a student’s learning journey and their ability to apply knowledge and skills in real-world scenarios. Below is an overview of key CBA methods:

Direct Observation: Direct observation involves systematically observing a student’s behavior and performance during classroom activities. It provides real-time data on a student’s engagement, participation, and interaction with instructional materials. Observations can be structured, where specific behaviors are targeted, or unstructured, capturing a broad range of behaviors. Direct observation allows for the collection of qualitative and quantitative data, making it a valuable CBA method.
Portfolios: Portfolios are collections of a student’s work over time, showcasing their progress and achievements. In CBA, portfolios include samples of assignments, projects, assessments, and other artifacts that reflect the student’s learning journey. Portfolios offer a holistic view of a student’s growth, highlighting strengths, areas for improvement, and the application of knowledge in various contexts.
Authentic Assessment: Authentic assessment tasks mirror real-life situations and require students to apply their knowledge and skills to solve complex problems. These tasks often go beyond traditional testing formats and may include projects, simulations, debates, and presentations. Authentic assessment aligns with constructivist and socio-cultural learning theories by emphasizing the practical application of learning in meaningful contexts.

Detailed Explanation of Techniques such as Direct Observation, Portfolios, and Authentic Assessment

Direct Observation: Direct observation is a valuable CBA technique that involves systematic and objective data collection through firsthand observations of a student’s behavior in the classroom. This method can be structured, with predetermined behaviors or skills to observe, or unstructured, allowing for more open-ended observations. School psychologists and educators use direct observation to assess a student’s engagement, attention, on-task behavior, and social interactions. Observations can be conducted using checklists, rating scales, or narrative descriptions. The data collected through direct observation provide valuable insights into a student’s behavior and performance within the curriculum.
Portfolios: Portfolios are a comprehensive CBA technique that showcases a student’s work, progress, and achievements over time. They typically include a variety of artifacts, such as completed assignments, projects, essays, artwork, and reflections. Portfolios offer a holistic view of a student’s learning journey and provide evidence of their ability to apply knowledge and skills in different contexts. School psychologists and educators can use portfolios to assess the quality and depth of a student’s work, identify areas of growth, and encourage self-reflection. Portfolios can also support the development of metacognitive skills as students reflect on their learning experiences.
Authentic Assessment: Authentic assessment techniques are designed to evaluate a student’s ability to apply knowledge and skills in real-world situations. Unlike traditional assessments that rely on multiple-choice questions or rote memorization, authentic assessment tasks are contextually relevant and require critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. Examples of authentic assessment include research projects, case studies, debates, simulations, and presentations. School psychologists and educators value authentic assessment because it aligns with constructivist learning theories and emphasizes the application of knowledge in practical scenarios. It encourages students to think critically, make connections between concepts, and demonstrate their understanding through meaningful tasks.

Discussion of the Role of Technology in Curriculum-Based Assessment

Technology plays a significant role in enhancing Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) practices. It offers innovative tools and platforms that streamline data collection, analysis, and reporting, making CBA more efficient and effective. Here are ways in which technology contributes to CBA:

Data Collection and Management: Technology allows for the digital recording of observations, creating electronic portfolios, and administering online assessments. These tools provide a centralized and organized way to collect and manage CBA data, reducing paperwork and administrative burdens for school psychologists and educators.
Real-Time Monitoring: Technology enables real-time monitoring of student progress and performance. Educators and school psychologists can use digital platforms to track student engagement, completion of assignments, and academic growth throughout the curriculum. This immediate feedback informs timely interventions and support.
Data Analysis: Advanced software and data analysis tools assist in the interpretation of CBA data. They can identify patterns, trends, and areas where students may be struggling. This data-driven approach informs instructional decisions and allows for targeted interventions.
Individualization: Technology supports the individualization of CBA. Adaptive learning platforms can tailor assessments and assignments to students’ specific needs and abilities. This personalization promotes a more precise understanding of each student’s progress within the curriculum.
Accessibility: Digital assessments and resources increase accessibility for students with diverse needs. Technology provides accommodations, such as text-to-speech or screen readers, ensuring that all students can participate in CBA activities.
Remote and Blended Learning: In recent years, the integration of technology has become even more critical due to the prevalence of remote and blended learning environments. Technology facilitates the implementation of CBA in both in-person and virtual classrooms.
Data Visualization: Technology allows for the visualization of CBA data through charts, graphs, and dashboards. These visual representations make it easier for educators, school psychologists, students, and parents to comprehend and interpret the assessment results.

In conclusion, technology enhances Curriculum-Based Assessment by simplifying data management, enabling real-time monitoring, supporting data analysis, promoting individualization, ensuring accessibility, accommodating remote learning, and offering data visualization tools. The integration of technology into CBA practices contributes to a more comprehensive and efficient approach to assessing student progress within the curriculum.

Applications and Benefits in School Psychology

How Curriculum-Based Assessment Contributes to Student Learning and Instructional Planning

Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) serves as a powerful tool in enhancing student learning and guiding instructional planning. Its applications in school psychology are multifaceted and contribute significantly to educational outcomes. Here’s an exploration of how CBA positively impacts student learning and instructional decision-making:

Informing Instructional Strategies: CBA provides educators with real-time data on student progress within the curriculum. This information enables teachers to tailor their instructional strategies to meet the specific needs of each student. For example, if CBA data indicate that a student struggles with reading comprehension, the teacher can adjust reading materials, implement targeted interventions, or provide additional support to improve the student’s skills.
Identifying Learning Trends: By regularly assessing student performance using CBA, educators can identify learning trends and patterns. They can recognize when students are excelling in certain areas and when they may need additional help. This data-driven approach allows for the early detection of academic challenges, making it possible to intervene promptly and prevent learning gaps from widening.
Setting Realistic Goals: CBA helps in setting achievable academic goals for students. Educators can use CBA data to establish specific, measurable, and attainable learning objectives. These goals serve as a roadmap for students, providing clarity on what they need to accomplish and how to track their progress.
Individualized Learning Plans: School psychologists and educators can collaborate to create individualized learning plans (ILPs) based on CBA data. ILPs outline customized strategies, accommodations, and interventions for students with diverse needs. Whether a student requires extra support due to a learning disability or advanced coursework due to giftedness, CBA informs the development of tailored educational plans.
Assessment of Skill Mastery: CBA is particularly effective in assessing the mastery of essential skills and competencies. It helps educators determine if students have achieved the learning objectives outlined in the curriculum. This information is crucial for deciding when to advance students to more complex content and when to provide additional practice or remediation.

Use in Special Education and Individualized Education Programs (IEPs)

Curriculum-Based Assessment plays a pivotal role in special education and the development of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). These programs are designed to meet the unique needs of students with disabilities and ensure they receive appropriate support and accommodations. Here’s how CBA contributes to this process:

Baseline Assessment: CBA provides a baseline assessment of a student’s abilities and challenges. School psychologists and special education teams can use this information to identify specific areas of need. For example, CBA might reveal that a student with dyslexia struggles with phonemic awareness, informing the creation of targeted interventions.
IEP Goal Development: Based on CBA data, IEP teams can set precise and measurable goals for students with disabilities. These goals are designed to address the student’s unique needs and challenges. Progress toward these goals is regularly monitored using CBA techniques, ensuring that the IEP remains aligned with the student’s progress.
Progress Monitoring: CBA serves as a valuable tool for tracking the progress of students with disabilities. It provides ongoing data on their academic growth, allowing educators to make informed decisions about the effectiveness of interventions and the need for adjustments to the IEP.
Accommodations and Modifications: CBA data inform the selection of appropriate accommodations and modifications for students with disabilities. These adjustments can include extended time on assessments, access to assistive technology, or alternative assessment formats. CBA helps ensure that these accommodations are tailored to the student’s specific needs.
Documentation and Accountability: CBA data are essential for documenting the educational progress of students with disabilities. They provide evidence of whether the student is meeting the goals outlined in the IEP. This documentation is crucial for ensuring accountability and compliance with special education regulations.

Addressing the Needs of Diverse Learners through Curriculum-Based Assessment

One of the strengths of Curriculum-Based Assessment is its versatility in addressing the needs of diverse learners in the classroom. It recognizes that students have unique learning styles, backgrounds, and abilities. Here’s how CBA supports the diverse needs of students:

Culturally Responsive Assessment: CBA can be adapted to be culturally responsive, considering the cultural backgrounds and experiences of students. This ensures that assessments are fair and equitable for all students, regardless of their cultural or linguistic diversity.
English Language Learners (ELLs): CBA can be tailored to assess the language proficiency and academic progress of English Language Learners. It helps educators identify areas where ELLs may require additional language support and track their language development over time.
Gifted and Talented Education: CBA can be used to identify and support gifted students by assessing their advanced skills and knowledge. It helps educators design differentiated instruction to challenge these students and ensure they reach their full potential.
Students with Behavioral Challenges: For students with behavioral challenges, CBA can be used to monitor behavior patterns and interventions. It helps school psychologists and educators identify triggers, evaluate the effectiveness of behavior support plans, and make data-informed decisions to improve behavior outcomes.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL): CBA aligns with the principles of Universal Design for Learning, which promotes flexible instructional methods and materials. By using a variety of CBA techniques, educators can create inclusive learning environments that accommodate the diverse needs of all students.

In summary, Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) contributes to student learning and instructional planning by informing strategies, identifying trends, setting goals, and supporting individualized learning plans. It plays a critical role in special education through baseline assessment, IEP goal development, progress monitoring, accommodations, and accountability. Additionally, CBA addresses the needs of diverse learners by allowing for culturally responsive assessment, supporting English Language Learners, fostering gifted education, assisting students with behavioral challenges, and aligning with Universal Design for Learning principles.

Challenges, Ethical Considerations, and Future Trends

Challenges and Limitations of Curriculum-Based Assessment in School Psychology

While Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) offers numerous benefits, it also presents certain challenges and limitations that school psychologists and educators must navigate. Understanding these challenges is crucial for the effective implementation of CBA. Here are some key issues:

Time and Resource Intensive: Implementing CBA can be time and resource-intensive. Creating assessments, collecting data, and analyzing results demand significant effort from educators and school psychologists. This can be challenging in schools with limited resources or large student populations.
Standardization: Maintaining consistency and standardization in CBA can be difficult, especially when educators develop their own assessments. Variability in assessment tools and procedures can make it challenging to compare data across students or classrooms.
Assessment Fatigue: Frequent assessments, especially if they are perceived as high-stakes, can lead to assessment fatigue in both students and educators. This may negatively affect motivation, engagement, and the accuracy of assessment results.
Alignment with Curriculum: Ensuring that assessments align closely with the curriculum can be a complex task. If assessments do not accurately reflect what students are expected to learn, the data obtained may not be valid for instructional planning.
Interpreting Data: Interpreting CBA data requires expertise in assessment and data analysis. School psychologists need to be proficient in translating assessment results into actionable recommendations for educators and students.

Ethical Guidelines and Potential Biases in Curriculum-Based Assessment

Ethical considerations play a vital role in the practice of Curriculum-Based Assessment. School psychologists and educators must adhere to ethical guidelines to ensure fairness, accuracy, and equity in assessment practices. Here are some ethical considerations and potential biases to be aware of:

Fairness and Equity: CBA must be administered fairly to all students, regardless of their background or characteristics. Any form of bias or discrimination in assessment practices is ethically unacceptable.
Informed Consent: Obtaining informed consent from students or their guardians is crucial, especially when assessments involve sensitive information or are used for research purposes. Consent ensures that individuals understand the purpose and implications of the assessment.
Privacy and Confidentiality: Maintaining the privacy and confidentiality of assessment data is paramount. School psychologists and educators must handle data in compliance with relevant laws and regulations, such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Cultural Sensitivity: CBA should be culturally sensitive and consider the diverse backgrounds and experiences of students. Culturally biased assessments can lead to inaccurate results and unfair educational decisions.
Bias Reduction: School psychologists should be vigilant in reducing biases in assessment practices. This includes addressing biases related to race, gender, socioeconomic status, and disability. Ongoing professional development is essential to enhance cultural competence.
Transparency: Assessment procedures and their implications should be transparent to all stakeholders, including students, parents, and educators. Transparent communication fosters trust and ensures that everyone involved understands the assessment process.

Emerging Trends and the Future of Curriculum-Based Assessment

The landscape of curriculum-based assessment is continually evolving, driven by technological advancements, research findings, and changing educational paradigms. The future of CBA holds promise for addressing current challenges and enhancing its effectiveness. Here are some emerging trends and developments:

Technology Integration: Technology is transforming CBA. The use of digital platforms, online assessments, and educational software allows for more efficient data collection, analysis, and reporting. Technology also enables adaptive assessments that tailor questions to individual student needs.
Data Analytics: Advanced data analytics and machine learning are enhancing the interpretation of CBA results. Predictive analytics can provide early warning signs of academic challenges, allowing for timely interventions.
Formative Assessment: CBA is increasingly being used for formative assessment, which focuses on providing ongoing feedback to improve learning. Formative assessment practices are aligning with personalized and competency-based education models.
Universal Screening: Universal screening using CBA is becoming more prevalent. It involves assessing all students to identify those who may require additional support. This proactive approach helps prevent learning gaps from developing.
Inclusive Assessment: Inclusive assessment practices are gaining traction. Educators are exploring ways to adapt CBA for students with disabilities or English language learners, ensuring that assessments are accessible to all.
Collaboration and Professional Development: Collaboration between school psychologists, educators, and other stakeholders is becoming central to effective CBA. Professional development in assessment literacy and cultural competence is on the rise.

In conclusion, Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) faces challenges related to resource allocation, standardization, and assessment fatigue. Ethical considerations include fairness, informed consent, privacy, and cultural sensitivity. However, emerging trends in technology integration, data analytics, formative assessment, universal screening, inclusive assessment, and collaboration hold promise for the future of CBA in school psychology. Adhering to ethical guidelines and staying attuned to these trends will help school psychologists enhance the effectiveness of CBA while ensuring fairness and equity in educational assessment practices.

Conclusion

Summary of Key Points

In this comprehensive exploration of Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) in school psychology, we have delved into its definition, historical evolution, theoretical underpinnings, methods, applications, and the ethical considerations it entails. Here’s a recap of the key points discussed:

Definition and Significance: CBA is a dynamic and student-centered assessment approach that evaluates a student’s performance in relation to the curriculum. It plays a pivotal role in tailoring instruction, promoting student learning, and fostering educational equity.

Theoretical Foundations: The theoretical foundations of CBA are rooted in educational psychology, learning theories, and cognitive psychology. The principles of behaviorism, constructivism, and assessment for learning inform its design and implementation.

Methods and Implementation: Various methods and techniques, such as direct observation, portfolios, and authentic assessment, are employed in CBA. Technology plays an increasingly prominent role in data collection and analysis, offering opportunities for personalized learning.

Applications and Benefits: CBA contributes significantly to student learning, aiding educators in understanding student progress and informing instructional planning. It is instrumental in individualized education programs (IEPs) for students with disabilities and addresses the diverse needs of learners.

Challenges and Ethical Considerations: Challenges in CBA include resource intensity, standardization, and assessment fatigue. Ethical guidelines are crucial to ensure fairness, equity, informed consent, privacy, and bias reduction in assessment practices.

Future Trends: Emerging trends in CBA involve technology integration, data analytics, formative assessment, universal screening, inclusive assessment, and collaboration. These trends hold the potential to enhance CBA’s efficacy and relevance.

Emphasis on the Continued Significance and Relevance of Curriculum-Based Assessment in School Psychology

As we reflect on the journey through the landscape of Curriculum-Based Assessment, it is evident that its significance and relevance in school psychology remain paramount. CBA is not merely a set of assessment techniques; it embodies a philosophy of education that places the learner at the center of the educational process.

CBA empowers educators and school psychologists with the tools to gain deep insights into student learning, tailor instruction to individual needs, and foster continuous improvement. Its adaptability to diverse educational settings and its capacity to address the needs of every learner, including those with disabilities and from diverse backgrounds, underscore its enduring relevance.

In an era marked by educational transformation and technological advancement, CBA stands as a foundational pillar of evidence-based practice in school psychology. It embodies the spirit of assessment for learning, promoting not only academic achievement but also holistic student development.

The future of CBA holds promise, as technology continues to shape assessment practices, data analytics provide new perspectives on student progress, and collaboration among stakeholders becomes increasingly essential. Through these advancements, CBA will remain a dynamic and indispensable tool for educators and school psychologists committed to enhancing student learning and ensuring educational equity.

In conclusion, Curriculum-Based Assessment is not a static concept but a dynamic force for positive change in education. Its continued significance in school psychology lies in its capacity to adapt, innovate, and empower educators to meet the evolving needs of students and create inclusive, student-centered learning environments. As we move forward, let us embrace the principles of CBA to nurture the full potential of every learner, fostering a brighter future for education.

References:

Alber, S. R. (2015). Effective grading practices in the middle school. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 179-199). Sage Publications.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Arter, J. A., & Chappuis, J. (2006). Creating and recognizing quality assessments. Pearson.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. (2002). Classroom assessment for learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(2), 3-13.
Erwin, T. D. (1991). The classroom assessment process. Prentice Hall.
Frisbie, D. A., & Waltman, D. M. (1990). Testing program validity: What is it, how is it determined, and why is it important? Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(3), 227-249.
Guskey, T. R. (2014). On your mark: Challenging the conventions of grading and reporting. Solution Tree Press.
Kim, J. S., & Lee, M. H. (2016). Online portfolio assessment: A comparison of scoring approaches. Computers & Education, 99, 110-121.
Krathwohl, D. R., & Smith, N. L. (2005). How to prepare a dissertation proposal: Suggestions for students in education and the social and behavioral sciences. Syracuse University Press.
Marzano, R. J. (2010). Formative assessment and standards‐based grading. Solution Tree Press.
McMillan, J. H. (2018). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective instruction. Pearson.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academies Press.
Popham, W. J. (2011). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Pearson.
Rock, D. A. (2009). Classroom assessment for students in special and general education. Merrill.
Ruef, M. L., & Layman, J. W. (2001). Developing and validating curriculum-based assessments. Psychology in the Schools, 38(5), 425-434.
Salend, S. J., & Garrick Duhaney, L. M. (2001). Curriculum-based assessment: Use and misuses. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(5), 46-54.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson.
Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328.
Stiggins, R. J., & Chappuis, J. (2012). An introduction to student-involved assessment for learning. Pearson.
Tierney, R., & Simon, M. (2004). Examining teachers’ decision making through the lens of professional community. Educational Policy, 18(5), 615-646.
Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. ASCD.
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Wolf, M. K., Herman, J. L., & Dietel, R. (2010). Curriculum-based external exit examinations: A policy perspective. Educational Policy, 24(2), 335-373.