Motor Assessment

Motor assessment plays a pivotal role in school psychology, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of students’ development and learning. This article explores the significance, historical context, and theoretical foundations of motor assessment. It delves into various methods and tools used to assess motor skills, including popular assessments such as the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and Peabody Developmental Motor Scales. The article examines the applications and benefits of motor assessment in early childhood, special education, and educational interventions. Additionally, it addresses challenges, ethical considerations, and emerging trends in motor assessment, including the integration of technology and virtual reality. By summarizing key points and emphasizing the continued relevance of motor assessment in school psychology, this article offers insights into this essential aspect of child development evaluation.

I. Introduction

A. Definition and Significance of Motor Assessment in School Psychology

Motor assessment, a fundamental component of school psychology, encompasses the evaluation of an individual’s physical and motor skills, including both fine and gross motor abilities. The significance of motor assessment in school psychology cannot be overstated, as it plays a crucial role in understanding students’ development, learning, and overall well-being. This introductory section aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the concept’s definition and the importance it holds within the realm of school psychology.

Motor assessment serves as a valuable tool for school psychologists, educators, and other professionals working with children and adolescents. It allows for the systematic examination of motor proficiency and its impact on various aspects of a student’s life, including academic performance, social interactions, and overall daily functioning. By assessing motor skills, school psychologists can identify areas of strength and weakness in students, enabling the development of tailored interventions and educational plans.

B. Historical Context: Evolution and Development of Motor Assessment

To fully appreciate the current landscape of motor assessment in school psychology, it is essential to explore its historical evolution. The roots of motor assessment can be traced back to early pioneers in psychology and education who recognized the importance of physical development and motor skills in children’s learning.

One of the foundational figures in this context is Jean-Jacques Rousseau, whose educational philosophy in the 18th century emphasized the significance of physical activity and play in childhood development. Rousseau’s ideas laid the groundwork for later educational reformers and theorists who contributed to the understanding of motor development in children.

In the 20th century, researchers like Arnold Gesell and Mabel Hines Hunt significantly advanced the field of motor assessment. Gesell’s work on developmental milestones and motor behavior paved the way for standardized assessments that measure children’s motor skills. Hunt’s research on perceptual-motor development further contributed to our understanding of the intricate relationship between sensory perception and motor abilities.

C. Overview of the Article’s Objectives and Structure

This article aims to provide a comprehensive exploration of motor assessment in school psychology, covering various aspects from its historical development to contemporary applications and challenges. The following sections will delve into the theoretical foundations of motor assessment, different methods and tools employed in its practice, and its wide-ranging applications in educational settings.

Section II will focus on the theoretical foundations of motor assessment, elucidating the underlying principles that inform its practice. Section III will delve into the methods and tools employed in motor assessment, including detailed explanations of popular assessments like the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales. Section IV will highlight the diverse applications and benefits of motor assessment in school psychology, including its role in early childhood development and special education.

Section V will address the challenges and ethical considerations associated with motor assessment, as well as emerging trends that are shaping its future. Finally, in Section VI, the article will conclude with a summary of key points discussed and an emphasis on the continued relevance and significance of motor assessment in the field of school psychology.

This comprehensive examination of motor assessment seeks to provide a valuable resource for school psychologists, educators, and professionals dedicated to promoting the holistic development of children and adolescents.

II. Theoretical Foundations of Motor Assessment

A. Motor Development Theories: A Brief Overview

Motor assessment in school psychology draws upon several prominent theoretical frameworks that help elucidate the developmental trajectory of motor skills and their implications for educational outcomes. This section provides a concise exploration of three influential motor development theories that underpin the practice of motor assessment.

1. Piaget’s Cognitive-Developmental Theory

Jean Piaget’s cognitive-developmental theory posits that cognitive development and motor development are intricately linked. According to Piaget, as children progress through different cognitive stages (sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational), their motor abilities also evolve. For example, the sensorimotor stage, spanning from birth to about two years, is characterized by the development of fundamental motor skills like grasping and crawling. As children move into the later stages, their motor skills become more refined and coordinated.

In the context of motor assessment, Piaget’s theory underscores the importance of aligning assessments with a child’s cognitive stage. Tasks and tests should be developmentally appropriate to ensure accurate evaluations of a child’s motor abilities. Moreover, Piaget’s theory informs the understanding that motor skills play a pivotal role in children’s exploration of their environment, contributing to cognitive growth.

2. Gesell’s Maturational Theory

Arnold Gesell’s maturational theory posits that motor development follows a genetically predetermined sequence. According to Gesell, each child has an innate timetable for acquiring motor skills, and individual variations are largely due to the pace at which this predetermined sequence unfolds. This theory emphasizes that motor development is largely a biological process, with environmental factors playing a supporting role.

In motor assessment, Gesell’s maturational theory is a foundational framework. Assessments often consider age-appropriate motor milestones and compare a child’s performance to expected developmental norms. This helps identify deviations from the expected sequence and informs early interventions. Gesell’s theory also highlights the importance of patience when assessing motor skills, acknowledging that each child may progress at their unique pace.

3. Dynamic Systems Theory

Dynamic systems theory offers a holistic perspective on motor development, emphasizing the interplay of various factors, including the child’s body, environment, and goals. This theory posits that motor skills emerge from the dynamic interaction of these components. In this view, motor development is not a linear sequence but a multifaceted, adaptable process.

In motor assessment, dynamic systems theory prompts a consideration of the child’s environment and goals. Assessments should be contextually relevant and capture the child’s ability to adapt their motor skills to different situations. This theory also underscores the importance of interventions that facilitate the coordination of multiple systems, such as sensory, perceptual, and motor systems, to enhance overall motor proficiency.

B. Relationship Between Motor Skills and Academic Achievement

Motor skills and academic achievement are interconnected in the educational context. Research has shown that motor skills development can significantly impact a child’s academic performance, particularly in areas like mathematics and literacy. Children with better-developed motor skills often exhibit higher levels of readiness for learning, as motor proficiency facilitates activities such as writing, drawing, and manipulating objects.

For instance, fine motor skills, including precise hand-eye coordination, are essential for tasks like handwriting and keyboarding, which are fundamental in modern education. Similarly, gross motor skills, such as balance and coordination, contribute to a child’s ability to participate in physical education activities and engage in classroom tasks without discomfort.

C. How Motor Development Theories Inform Motor Assessment Practices

Motor development theories provide a conceptual framework for motor assessment practices in school psychology. Educators and school psychologists utilize these theories to design assessments that align with developmental stages, account for individual differences, and consider environmental factors. By incorporating insights from these theories, motor assessments become more nuanced and effective tools for understanding a child’s motor abilities and their potential impact on academic and overall development.

Furthermore, these theories inform interventions and educational planning. For example, if a child’s motor assessment suggests a lag in fine motor skills development, interventions may be designed to target specific areas of improvement, such as hand dexterity and finger strength. The theoretical underpinnings also guide the selection of appropriate interventions and accommodations, ensuring that they are developmentally and cognitively appropriate for the child.

In summary, the theoretical foundations of motor development theories serve as the bedrock upon which motor assessment practices in school psychology are built. These theories offer valuable insights into the intricate relationship between motor skills, cognitive development, and academic achievement, guiding practitioners in their efforts to support children’s holistic development.

III. Methods and Tools for Motor Assessment

A. Overview of Motor Assessment Methods

Motor assessment in school psychology encompasses a variety of methods aimed at evaluating a child’s motor skills and abilities. These methods are instrumental in understanding a child’s developmental progress, identifying potential motor difficulties, and informing educational interventions. This section provides an overview of the primary methods used in motor assessment.

Motor assessment methods can be broadly categorized into two main approaches:

1. Standardized Assessments: These assessments employ structured tasks and standardized procedures to measure a child’s motor skills and compare their performance to age- or grade-appropriate norms. Standardized assessments provide objective data and facilitate comparisons across individuals.
2. Observational Assessments: Observational assessments involve the systematic observation of a child’s motor behaviors in naturalistic settings, such as the classroom or playground. These assessments offer insights into a child’s everyday motor functioning and can reveal context-specific challenges.

B. Detailed Explanation of Commonly Used Motor Assessment Tools

Several motor assessment tools are widely utilized in school psychology to assess various aspects of motor development. Here, we delve into the specifics of three commonly employed assessment tools:

1. The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2): The BOT-2 is a comprehensive, standardized assessment designed to evaluate a wide range of motor skills in individuals aged 4 to 21 years. It assesses both fine and gross motor skills, including manual dexterity, coordination, balance, and speed of motor response. The assessment consists of eight subtests that cover areas such as fine motor precision, bilateral coordination, and balance. It yields standard scores, percentile ranks, and descriptive categories, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of a child’s motor proficiency. The BOT-2 is frequently used in school settings to identify motor difficulties, inform intervention planning, and monitor progress over time.
2. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2): The PDMS-2 is a widely recognized assessment tool for evaluating the motor development of children aged birth to 6 years. It assesses both fine and gross motor skills and is especially useful for identifying motor delays in young children. The assessment comprises six subtests that measure areas such as reflexes, stationary skills, locomotion, and object manipulation. The PDMS-2 provides standard scores, percentile ranks, and age equivalents, enabling school psychologists to gauge a child’s motor development in comparison to their peers. Early identification of motor delays through the PDMS-2 is crucial for timely intervention and support.
3. Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (Beery VMI): The Beery VMI assesses visual-motor integration, a critical skill for activities like handwriting and drawing. It is designed for individuals aged 2 to 100 years. The assessment asks participants to copy a series of geometric shapes, emphasizing the integration of visual perception and motor coordination. The Beery VMI provides standard scores and percentile ranks, allowing school psychologists to evaluate a child’s ability to reproduce visual stimuli accurately. This assessment is valuable for identifying visual-motor integration difficulties that may impact academic tasks requiring precise motor control, such as writing.

C. The Role of Technology in Motor Assessment

Technology has significantly enhanced the field of motor assessment in school psychology. Advancements in digital tools and software applications have provided new avenues for conducting motor assessments and collecting data efficiently. Here are some ways in which technology is integrated into motor assessment:

1. Digital Assessment Tools: Digital platforms and software applications offer interactive motor assessment tasks that engage children while collecting objective data. These tools often provide real-time feedback and can be more engaging for students.
2. Motion Capture Systems: High-tech motion capture systems, including 3D cameras and wearable sensors, allow for precise measurement of body movements. These systems provide detailed kinematic data, enabling a more in-depth analysis of motor performance.
3. Telehealth and Remote Assessments: Telehealth services have become increasingly relevant, especially in the context of remote or hybrid learning environments. School psychologists can conduct motor assessments via video conferencing platforms, making assessment services more accessible to students regardless of location.
4. Data Analysis Software: Advanced data analysis software aids in the interpretation of motor assessment results. It allows for the visualization of data trends, making it easier to identify areas of strength and weakness in a child’s motor skills.
5. Gamified Assessments: Gamified assessments leverage technology to create engaging, game-like motor tasks. These assessments are particularly appealing to children and can provide valuable data on their motor abilities.

Incorporating technology into motor assessment practices offers several advantages, including increased objectivity, enhanced engagement, and the ability to collect and analyze data efficiently. However, it is essential for school psychologists to ensure that any technology used in assessments aligns with ethical guidelines and maintains the privacy and confidentiality of students’ information.

In conclusion, motor assessment in school psychology relies on a range of methods and assessment tools that provide valuable insights into a child’s motor development. By combining standardized assessments, observational methods, and technology-driven approaches, school psychologists can effectively evaluate motor skills, identify areas of concern, and tailor interventions to support students’ motor development.

IV. Applications and Benefits of Motor Assessment

Motor assessment in school psychology serves as a vital tool for understanding and supporting students’ motor development and well-being. This section explores the diverse applications and benefits of motor assessment in educational settings, emphasizing its role in early childhood, special education, educational interventions, and multidisciplinary collaboration.

A. Motor Assessment in Early Childhood

Early childhood is a critical period for motor development, as foundational motor skills are established during this time. Motor assessment plays a pivotal role in monitoring and promoting motor development in young children. Here are some key applications:

1. Early Identification of Motor Delays: Motor assessment tools like the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2) are instrumental in identifying motor delays and difficulties in young children. Early identification enables timely intervention, which can prevent long-term motor challenges and improve overall development.
2. Supporting School Readiness: Motor assessment helps educators and school psychologists gauge a child’s readiness for school. Children with well-developed motor skills often experience a smoother transition to formal education, as motor proficiency contributes to success in classroom activities and social interactions.
3. Tailoring Physical Education: Motor assessment results inform the adaptation of physical education programs to meet the individual needs of young learners. By identifying specific motor strengths and weaknesses, educators can design activities that enhance motor skills and physical fitness.

B. Motor Assessment for Students with Special Needs

Motor assessment is particularly valuable for students with special needs, as it aids in identifying motor difficulties and tailoring interventions. Here’s how motor assessment benefits this population:

1. Individualized Education Plans (IEPs): Students with disabilities often require specialized support. Motor assessment results contribute to the development of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) that address motor-related goals and accommodations.
2. Early Intervention: For students with motor delays or impairments, early intervention is crucial. Motor assessments help pinpoint areas of need, enabling prompt initiation of intervention services, such as physical or occupational therapy.
3. Monitoring Progress: Regular motor assessments allow school psychologists and educators to track a student’s progress in motor skill development. Adjustments to interventions can be made based on assessment results, ensuring continuous improvement.

C. Linking Motor Assessment to Educational Interventions

Motor assessment is a foundational component of evidence-based practice in school psychology. It facilitates the development of targeted educational interventions aimed at improving motor skills and enhancing overall educational outcomes. Key applications include:

1. Tailored Instruction: Assessment results guide educators in designing individualized or group instruction plans that address specific motor skill deficits. Tailored instruction ensures that students receive the support they need to succeed.
2. Behavioral Interventions: For students with behavioral challenges linked to motor difficulties, motor assessment informs the development of behavior intervention plans (BIPs). These plans incorporate strategies to address underlying motor issues that may contribute to behavioral problems.
3. Progress Monitoring: Regular motor assessments enable ongoing progress monitoring. This iterative process ensures that interventions are effective and can be adjusted as needed to achieve desired outcomes.

D. Multidisciplinary Collaboration in Motor Assessment

Effective motor assessment often requires collaboration among various professionals, including school psychologists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and educators. Benefits of multidisciplinary collaboration include:

1. Comprehensive Assessment: Collaboration ensures that motor assessment is comprehensive, addressing a wide range of motor skills and abilities. Each professional brings a unique perspective to the assessment process.
2. Holistic Intervention: Collaborative efforts result in holistic interventions that consider not only motor skills but also cognitive, emotional, and social factors. This approach leads to more well-rounded support for students.
3. Efficient Resource Allocation: Multidisciplinary teams can allocate resources efficiently by focusing interventions where they are most needed. This approach maximizes the impact of support services.

In conclusion, motor assessment in school psychology offers numerous applications and benefits across various educational contexts. It contributes to early identification, supports students with special needs, informs educational interventions, and encourages multidisciplinary collaboration. By recognizing the importance of motor assessment, school psychologists can play a pivotal role in promoting students’ motor development and overall success in the educational setting.

V. Challenges, Ethical Considerations, and Future Trends in Motor Assessment

As with any assessment tool, motor assessment in school psychology comes with its own set of challenges, ethical considerations, and evolving trends that impact its practice. This section delves into the complexities of motor assessment, the ethical guidelines that guide it, and the emerging trends shaping its future.

A. Challenges and Limitations of Motor Assessment in School Psychology

1. Cultural and Linguistic Diversity: One of the foremost challenges is ensuring that motor assessment tools are culturally and linguistically sensitive. Standardized assessments may not accurately reflect the motor skills of students from diverse cultural backgrounds, potentially leading to misdiagnosis or underestimation of abilities.
2. Interconnected Nature of Development: Motor development is intricately linked with cognitive, emotional, and social development. Isolating motor skills for assessment purposes can be challenging, as they often overlap with other domains. This interconnectivity underscores the importance of considering the whole child during assessment.
3. Reliability and Validity: Like other assessments, motor assessments must demonstrate high reliability and validity. Ensuring that these assessments consistently measure what they are intended to measure can be a significant challenge, particularly when assessing diverse motor skills.
4. Resource Constraints: Many schools face resource limitations, including funding and access to trained professionals, which can hinder the implementation of comprehensive motor assessments. This limitation may affect the quality and frequency of assessments.

B. Ethical Guidelines and Considerations in Motor Assessment

1. Informed Consent: Obtaining informed consent from parents or guardians is an ethical imperative when conducting motor assessments on students, particularly when specialized assessments or interventions are involved. Transparency about the purpose, process, and potential outcomes of assessments is crucial.
2. Confidentiality: Motor assessment results, like other assessment data, should be treated with the utmost confidentiality. School psychologists and professionals involved in the assessment process must ensure that sensitive motor assessment data is not disclosed without proper consent.
3. Cultural Competency: To address cultural and linguistic diversity, school psychologists must strive for cultural competency when conducting motor assessments. This includes using culturally sensitive assessment tools and recognizing how cultural factors may influence motor development.
4. Non-Discrimination: Ethical considerations demand that motor assessments do not discriminate against students with disabilities or diverse backgrounds. Fair and equitable assessment practices are essential to uphold students’ rights and ensure access to appropriate interventions.

C. Emerging Trends and Innovations in Motor Assessment

1. Virtual Reality and Motor Assessment: Virtual reality (VR) technologies are increasingly being integrated into motor assessment practices. VR provides a controlled and immersive environment for assessing motor skills and can be particularly beneficial for students with mobility challenges. It offers a dynamic and engaging platform for evaluating motor abilities and tracking progress.
2. Integrating Motor and Cognitive Assessments: Emerging trends emphasize the integration of motor and cognitive assessments. Recognizing the close relationship between motor skills and cognitive functioning, assessments that combine both domains provide a more comprehensive understanding of a student’s abilities. This holistic approach can inform more targeted interventions that address both motor and cognitive needs.

These innovations not only enhance the precision and accuracy of motor assessment but also align with the broader movement towards multidimensional assessments that consider the interconnectedness of various developmental domains.

In conclusion, motor assessment in school psychology faces challenges related to diversity, reliability, and resource constraints. Ethical considerations revolve around informed consent, confidentiality, cultural competency, and non-discrimination. However, the future of motor assessment is promising, with emerging trends such as virtual reality applications and the integration of motor and cognitive assessments on the horizon. As school psychologists continue to adapt to these challenges and embrace evolving trends, motor assessment will play an increasingly valuable role in promoting students’ holistic development and well-being.

VI. Conclusion

A. Summary of Key Points

This article has explored the multifaceted domain of motor assessment in school psychology, shedding light on its definition, historical context, theoretical foundations, assessment methods, applications, challenges, ethical considerations, and emerging trends. By summarizing the key points discussed throughout the article, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the significance of motor assessment in the field of school psychology.

Motor assessment in school psychology is the systematic process of evaluating a student’s motor skills and abilities. It encompasses a wide range of skills, from fine and gross motor skills to perceptual-motor integration. These assessments are essential for identifying motor-related issues, such as developmental delays, motor disorders, or the need for specialized interventions.

The historical context of motor assessment reveals its evolution from early theories of motor development to contemporary, multidimensional approaches. Pioneers like Alfred Binet and Arnold Gesell laid the groundwork for our understanding of motor development and assessment. Today, motor assessment has evolved to incorporate advanced tools and technologies that provide a more accurate and comprehensive picture of a student’s motor abilities.

Theoretical foundations, including Piaget’s cognitive-developmental theory and dynamic systems theory, have informed the practice of motor assessment. These theories emphasize the interconnectedness of motor skills with cognitive, emotional, and social development, underscoring the importance of holistic assessment approaches.

Assessment methods discussed in this article include a variety of standardized tools such as the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2), Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2), and Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (Beery VMI). These assessments play a pivotal role in identifying motor-related challenges and guiding intervention strategies. Moreover, the integration of technology has introduced innovative approaches to motor assessment, such as virtual reality, which enhances precision and engagement in the assessment process.

The applications of motor assessment in school psychology are diverse and far-reaching. From early childhood assessments that aid in early intervention to assessments for students with special needs, motor assessment guides individualized educational planning and supports tailored interventions. Collaboration among multidisciplinary teams is essential for maximizing the benefits of motor assessment, ensuring that students receive holistic support that addresses their unique needs.

B. Continued Significance and Relevance of Motor Assessment in School Psychology

Motor assessment remains a cornerstone of school psychology, contributing significantly to the holistic development of students. As we reflect on the content presented in this article, it becomes evident that motor assessment is not merely a stand-alone process; rather, it is deeply intertwined with cognitive, emotional, and social development. Understanding a student’s motor abilities provides valuable insights into their overall functioning and informs targeted interventions.

The continued significance of motor assessment lies in its ability to identify developmental delays and motor disorders at an early stage. Early intervention, guided by motor assessment results, can make a profound difference in a student’s trajectory, fostering the development of essential skills and addressing potential challenges. Moreover, motor assessment plays a pivotal role in the inclusion of students with disabilities, ensuring that they receive the support necessary to thrive in educational settings.

In an era of rapidly advancing technology, motor assessment is poised for exciting developments. Innovations such as virtual reality assessments and the integration of motor and cognitive assessments offer promising avenues for enhancing the precision and scope of motor assessment. These trends align with the broader shift toward multidimensional assessments that consider the interconnectedness of various developmental domains.

In conclusion, motor assessment in school psychology is an indispensable tool for promoting students’ holistic development and well-being. By continuing to refine assessment methods, embrace emerging technologies, and uphold ethical standards, school psychologists can ensure that motor assessment remains a relevant and impactful practice in the years to come. As we navigate the complex landscape of student development, motor assessment stands as a beacon of insight, guiding us toward informed decisions and interventions that nurture the potential of every student.

References:

1. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms & Profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
2. American Psychological Association. (2020). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
3. Barnett, A. L., & Henderson, S. E. (2001). The profile of motor impairment in Asperger’s syndrome: Physical and motor skills problems in Asperger’s syndrome. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 43(11), 655-668.
4. Bruininks, R. H., & Bruininks, B. D. (2005). Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (2nd ed.). Pearson.
5. Darrah, J., Magill-Evans, J., & Volden, J. (2007). Motor development as a context for understanding parent-child interactions in young children with cerebral palsy. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 27(4), 3-19.
6. Feder, K. P., & Majnemer, A. (2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49(4), 312-317.
7. Gesell, A., & Amatruda, C. S. (1947). Developmental diagnosis: Normal and abnormal child development, clinical methods and pediatric applications. Harper.
8. Hohmann, L. M., & Weikart, D. P. (1979). Educating young children: Active learning practices for preschool and child care programs. High/Scope Press.
9. Iverson, J. M. (2010). Developing language in a developing body: The relationship between motor development and language development. Journal of Child Language, 37(2), 229-261.
10. Iverson, J. M., & Braddock, B. A. (2011). Gesture and motor skill in relation to language in children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(1), 72-86.
11. Kamen, E. M., & Landry, S. H. (1998). Fathering and children’s peer relationships. In A. J. Sameroff (Ed.), The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other (pp. 341-378). American Psychological Association.
12. Largo, R. H., Caflisch, J. A., & Hug, F. (2001). Neuromotor development from 5 to 18 years: Part 2: Associated movements. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 43(7), 444-453.
13. Li, X., & Atkins, M. S. (2004). Early childhood computer experience and cognitive and motor development. Pediatrics, 113(6), 1715-1722.
14. Lopes, P. B., & Rotta, T. M. (2019). The role of motor abilities in children’s school readiness. Early Education and Development, 30(3), 305-318.
15. Newell, K. M., & Scully, D. M. (1983). The biomechanics of running. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. T. Turvey (Eds.), Human motor behavior: An introduction (pp. 169-211). Psychology Press.
16. Okely, A. D., Booth, M. L., & Chey, T. N. (2004). Relationships between body composition and fundamental movement skills among children and adolescents. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 75(3), 238-247.
17. Piper, M. C., Pinnell, L. E., Darrah, J., Maguire, T., & Byrne, P. J. (1992). Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Canadian Journal of Public Health/Revue Canadienne de Sante’e Publique, 83(Suppl 2), S46-S50.
18. Van der Mars, H. (1989). Movement skill assessment. Human Kinetics.
19. Voegtline, K. M., & Stifter, C. A. (2010). Late-preterm birth, maternal symptomatology, and infant negativity. Infant Behavior and Development, 33(4), 545-554.
20. Volkmar, F. R., & Pauls, D. (1987). Autism. The Lancet, 329(8542), 1357-1360.
21. Voss, M. W., Kramer, A. F., Basak, C., Prakash, R. S., & Roberts, B. (2009). Are expert athletes ‘expert’ in the cognitive laboratory? A meta-analytic review of cognition and sport expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 812-826.
22. Wang, J. J., & Spalding, T. W. (2000). Relationships among motor proficiency, physical activity, and fitness in 8-year-old Taiwanese children. Pediatric Exercise Science, 12(3), 297-312.
23. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Riverside Publishing.