Social-Emotional Assessment

Social-emotional assessment in school psychology plays a pivotal role in fostering students’ emotional well-being, interpersonal skills, and overall development. This comprehensive article delves into the multifaceted domain of social-emotional assessment, emphasizing its significance in educational contexts. Beginning with an exploration of its historical evolution and theoretical underpinnings, we delve into the various methods and tools used for assessment. The article outlines the diverse applications and benefits of social-emotional assessment, from early intervention to addressing the unique needs of diverse learners. Challenges, ethical considerations, and emerging trends in this field are also discussed. By offering insights into its theoretical foundations, practical applications, and ethical dimensions, this article underscores the continued importance of social-emotional assessment in school psychology.

I: Introduction

A. Definition and Significance of Social-Emotional Assessment in School Psychology

Social-Emotional Assessment in School Psychology is a fundamental aspect of evaluating and promoting the emotional and social well-being of students within educational settings. It encompasses a range of techniques and tools designed to assess and understand students’ emotional intelligence, social skills, and overall mental health. In essence, it seeks to answer crucial questions about students’ emotional states, social interactions, and the factors influencing their behavior. Assessing the social-emotional aspects of students’ lives is essential because it provides valuable insights into their readiness to learn, their ability to engage with peers, and their overall mental health. By identifying areas of concern or strength, school psychologists can tailor interventions and support that facilitate positive emotional growth and academic success.

The significance of social-emotional assessment in school psychology is underscored by its far-reaching impact on students’ lives. In addition to academic success, students need emotional intelligence and social competence to navigate the challenges of the educational environment and beyond. These skills help them form healthy relationships, make responsible decisions, and manage stress effectively. Moreover, a robust social-emotional foundation has been linked to better mental health outcomes and decreased risk of behavioral problems. School psychologists play a pivotal role in facilitating this process by employing various assessment tools, collaborating with educators and families, and implementing evidence-based interventions.

B. Historical Context: Evolution and Development of Social-Emotional Assessment

The evolution of Social-Emotional Assessment in School Psychology is rooted in the recognition of the profound influence of emotions and social interactions on learning and development. While the formalization of this field is relatively recent, its historical foundations can be traced back to early educational and psychological theories. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, educational reformers and psychologists, such as John Dewey and G. Stanley Hall, emphasized the importance of considering students’ emotions and social experiences in the educational process. However, it wasn’t until the mid-20th century that systematic approaches to social-emotional assessment began to emerge.

One pivotal moment in the development of social-emotional assessment was the recognition of emotional and behavioral disorders in children, leading to the establishment of special education services. Federal laws like the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 1975 mandated the assessment of emotional and behavioral needs to provide appropriate interventions. This legal framework marked a significant turning point, acknowledging the importance of assessing social-emotional well-being in educational contexts.

In recent decades, the field has continued to evolve with advances in psychology, neuroscience, and education. The advent of evidence-based practices, increased awareness of mental health issues among children and adolescents, and the integration of technology in assessment have further shaped the landscape of social-emotional assessment. As a result, school psychologists are equipped with a diverse set of assessment tools and intervention strategies to address the complex social-emotional needs of students.

C. Overview of the Article’s Objectives and Structure

This comprehensive article on Social-Emotional Assessment in School Psychology is structured to provide a holistic understanding of the field. It will delve into the historical context and theoretical foundations that underpin social-emotional assessment practices. The article will also explore the methods and tools used for assessment, highlighting their utility and considerations for implementation. Furthermore, it will outline the diverse applications and benefits of social-emotional assessment, including early intervention, fostering a positive school climate, and addressing the unique needs of diverse student populations.

In addition to its positive aspects, this article will discuss the challenges and ethical considerations associated with social-emotional assessment. These include issues related to cultural sensitivity, confidentiality, and the potential for bias. Emerging trends and innovations in social-emotional assessment, such as the integration of technology and the promotion of comprehensive assessment approaches, will also be explored.

Ultimately, this article aims to underscore the critical role of social-emotional assessment in school psychology. It emphasizes its importance in enhancing students’ emotional well-being, promoting positive social interactions, and contributing to their overall development. By providing insights into its theoretical foundations, practical applications, and ethical dimensions, this article seeks to highlight the continued significance of social-emotional assessment in the realm of school psychology.

II: Theoretical Foundations of Social-Emotional Assessment

A. Explanation of Social-Emotional Assessment

Social-Emotional Assessment in School Psychology involves a systematic process of evaluating and understanding the emotional and social development of students. It encompasses a broad range of skills and competencies related to recognizing, expressing, regulating, and managing emotions, as well as engaging effectively in social interactions. The primary goal of social-emotional assessment is to gather information that informs intervention strategies, supports students’ emotional well-being, and enhances their social competence.

Social-emotional assessment typically incorporates a variety of tools, methods, and observations to gain insights into students’ emotional states, interpersonal relationships, and behavioral responses in different contexts. These assessments are designed to answer important questions about a student’s emotional functioning, such as whether they are experiencing emotional distress, demonstrating age-appropriate emotional regulation, or exhibiting social behaviors that may require intervention or support. School psychologists and other professionals employ a combination of standardized assessments, interviews, observations, and self-report measures to comprehensively assess a student’s social and emotional development.

B. Key Theories Underlying Social-Emotional Assessment in School Psychology

1. Attachment Theory

Attachment theory, developed by John Bowlby, provides a foundational framework for understanding the emotional bonds that children form with their caregivers and how these bonds influence their social and emotional development. Bowlby proposed that secure attachments are crucial for healthy emotional development and serve as a foundation for positive social interactions. In the context of social-emotional assessment, attachment theory informs practitioners about the importance of assessing a student’s attachment patterns, as disruptions in attachment can manifest in emotional and behavioral difficulties. Assessments often explore a student’s relationships with caregivers, peers, and educators to identify any attachment-related issues that may require intervention.

2. Social Learning Theory

Social Learning Theory, as proposed by Albert Bandura, emphasizes the role of observational learning and modeling in the development of social and emotional competencies. Bandura’s theory posits that individuals learn by observing the behaviors, attitudes, and emotional expressions of others and that this learning influences their own social interactions. In the context of assessment, Social Learning Theory highlights the importance of evaluating a student’s ability to observe, learn from, and adapt to the behaviors and emotions of those around them. Assessments may examine a student’s capacity for empathy, perspective-taking, and social problem-solving, all of which are informed by Social Learning Theory.

3. Emotional Intelligence Theory

Emotional Intelligence Theory, developed by Peter Salovey and John Mayer, focuses on the ability to recognize, understand, manage, and use emotions effectively in various life situations. This theory highlights the significance of emotional intelligence as a key component of social and emotional development. In the context of social-emotional assessment, Emotional Intelligence Theory informs the evaluation of a student’s emotional awareness, empathy, self-regulation, and interpersonal skills. Assessments often include measures of emotional intelligence to gauge a student’s capacity to navigate social situations, build positive relationships, and respond adaptively to emotional challenges.

C. How These Theories Inform Social-Emotional Assessment Practices

These foundational theories underpin social-emotional assessment practices in school psychology by guiding the selection of assessment tools, the interpretation of assessment results, and the development of intervention strategies. For example, attachment theory informs assessments by highlighting the importance of evaluating a student’s attachment relationships, as disruptions in attachment can lead to emotional and behavioral difficulties. Social Learning Theory underscores the significance of assessing a student’s ability to learn from observing others and adapt their behaviors in social contexts. Emotional Intelligence Theory informs the inclusion of measures that assess a student’s emotional awareness, empathy, and self-regulation.

Furthermore, these theories emphasize the dynamic nature of social-emotional development and the importance of considering the environmental and interpersonal factors that influence it. School psychologists and other professionals use these theories to tailor assessments and interventions to each student’s unique needs, recognizing that social-emotional development is a complex interplay of individual, family, and cultural factors. By integrating these theoretical foundations into assessment practices, school psychologists can better understand and support students in their emotional and social growth.

III: Methods and Tools for Social-Emotional Assessment

A. Overview of Social-Emotional Assessment Methods

Social-Emotional Assessment in school psychology employs a variety of methods to gather comprehensive information about students’ emotional and social functioning. These methods are carefully selected to provide a holistic understanding of a student’s social and emotional development and to inform appropriate interventions. The process of social-emotional assessment often involves the collaboration of school psychologists, educators, parents, and other relevant stakeholders. Here, we provide an overview of the methods used in social-emotional assessment:

  1. Behavior Rating Scales: Behavior rating scales are structured tools that involve collecting information from teachers, parents, or caregivers about a student’s behavior in various social and emotional contexts. These scales use rating items to assess specific behavioral and emotional domains, such as aggression, anxiety, depression, or social skills. They provide valuable insights into how a student’s social and emotional functioning is perceived by others in their daily environments.
  2. Self-Report Questionnaires: Self-report questionnaires are assessments in which students themselves provide information about their emotions, thoughts, and behaviors. These questionnaires typically consist of a series of items or statements that students respond to based on their experiences. Self-report measures assess a wide range of emotional and social constructs, including self-esteem, emotional regulation, social anxiety, and interpersonal relationships.
  3. Observational Assessment: Observational assessment involves direct and systematic observation of a student’s behavior in various settings, such as the classroom, playground, or home. Observers use predefined criteria to document specific behaviors, interactions, and emotional expressions. This method provides valuable real-time data on how a student navigates social situations and expresses their emotions.

B. Detailed Explanation of Commonly Used Social-Emotional Assessment Tools

Social-emotional assessment tools are designed to provide structured and standardized ways of collecting data on students’ social and emotional functioning. These tools vary in their focus, administration methods, and intended age groups. Here, we delve into three commonly used social-emotional assessment tools:

1. Behavior Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)

The Behavior Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3) is a widely used behavior rating scale that assesses a range of emotional and behavioral domains in children and adolescents. It is completed by teachers, parents, and students themselves. The BASC-3 measures several critical areas, including externalizing and internalizing problems, adaptive behaviors, and social skills. It provides valuable information on a student’s behavior and emotional well-being, helping school psychologists identify areas of concern and develop targeted interventions.

2. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess social-emotional and behavioral difficulties in children and adolescents. It is commonly used in both clinical and school settings. The SDQ covers emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behaviors. Its brevity and ease of administration make it a practical tool for quickly screening social and emotional issues in students. The SDQ can be completed by students, parents, or teachers.

3. Ainsworth’s Strange Situation

Ainsworth’s Strange Situation is an observational assessment method primarily used to assess attachment patterns in young children. This structured laboratory procedure involves a series of separations and reunions between the child and their caregiver. The child’s behavior during these episodes is carefully observed and categorized into attachment patterns, including secure attachment, insecure-avoidant attachment, and insecure-ambivalent attachment. Ainsworth’s Strange Situation provides insights into a child’s attachment style and emotional regulation in response to separations and reunions.

C. Ethical Considerations in Social-Emotional Assessment

Ethical considerations are paramount in social-emotional assessment to ensure that students’ rights and well-being are protected throughout the assessment process. Several key ethical considerations include:

  1. Informed Consent: Parents or legal guardians must provide informed consent before a student is assessed. They should be fully informed about the purpose, procedures, and potential outcomes of the assessment.
  2. Confidentiality: School psychologists and assessors must safeguard the confidentiality of assessment results. Information should only be shared with individuals who have a legitimate need to know and must be used for the sole purpose of supporting the student’s well-being.
  3. Cultural Sensitivity: Assessors should be culturally competent and aware of the cultural norms and values that may influence a student’s behavior and emotional expression. Assessment tools and methods should be culturally sensitive and unbiased.
  4. Age-Appropriate Assessment: Assessments should be developmentally appropriate and adapted to the student’s age and developmental stage. Younger students may require simplified language and visual aids to comprehend assessment questions.
  5. Feedback and Support: After assessment, parents, teachers, and students should receive feedback about the results and any recommended interventions. Support and resources should be provided to address identified social and emotional concerns.

Adhering to these ethical principles ensures that social-emotional assessment is conducted with integrity, respect, and a focus on the best interests of the student. School psychologists play a critical role in upholding these ethical standards and promoting the well-being of students in the assessment process.

IV: Applications and Benefits of Social-Emotional Assessment

Social-Emotional Assessment serves as a valuable tool in school psychology, aiding educators, school psychologists, and other professionals in understanding and supporting students’ emotional and social development. In this section, we explore the multifaceted applications and benefits of Social-Emotional Assessment within educational settings, counseling, and intervention, and its role in addressing the diverse needs of learners.

A. Social-Emotional Assessment in Educational Settings

1. Identifying Emotional and Behavioral Issues

Social-Emotional Assessment plays a pivotal role in identifying emotional and behavioral issues in students. By systematically collecting data through various assessment methods, school psychologists can gain insights into students’ emotional well-being, social interactions, and behavioral patterns. The early identification of emotional issues, such as anxiety, depression, or conduct disorders, enables timely intervention and support.

Benefits:

  • Early Intervention: Identifying emotional and behavioral issues early allows for prompt intervention, reducing the risk of these issues escalating.
  • Customized Support: Assessment results inform the development of individualized support plans tailored to each student’s unique needs.
  • Preventing Academic Challenges: Addressing emotional and behavioral issues promptly can prevent associated academic difficulties and school disengagement.

2. Supporting Social and Emotional Learning (SEL)

Social-Emotional Assessment is instrumental in promoting Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) within educational settings. SEL programs aim to cultivate students’ emotional intelligence, self-awareness, interpersonal skills, and responsible decision-making. Assessments help educators and school psychologists measure the effectiveness of SEL programs and identify areas that require additional attention.

Benefits:

  • Measuring Progress: Assessments provide data on students’ SEL competencies, helping educators gauge their progress in areas like self-regulation and empathy.
  • Tailored Interventions: Assessment results guide educators in tailoring SEL interventions to address specific needs, fostering a positive school climate.
  • Positive Outcomes: SEL initiatives supported by assessment tend to yield positive outcomes, such as improved classroom behavior and academic performance.

B. Use of Social-Emotional Assessment in Counseling and Intervention

1. Early Intervention and Prevention

Social-Emotional Assessment is a powerful tool for early intervention and prevention of emotional and behavioral challenges. School psychologists use assessment data to identify students at risk, even before issues manifest fully. Early interventions may involve counseling, targeted interventions, or referral to external mental health services.

Benefits:

  • Reducing Stigma: Early intervention reduces the stigma associated with seeking help for emotional and behavioral challenges.
  • Enhancing Resilience: Students who receive timely support are better equipped to build resilience and cope with life stressors.
  • Positive School Climate: Schools that prioritize early intervention often cultivate a more supportive and inclusive climate.

2. Developing Individualized Social-Emotional Plans

Individualized Social-Emotional Plans (ISEPs) are akin to Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) but focus on students’ social and emotional needs. Social-Emotional Assessment provides essential data for developing ISEPs tailored to each student’s strengths and challenges. These plans outline specific goals, interventions, and strategies to support social and emotional growth.

Benefits:

  • Customized Support: ISEPs are highly personalized, addressing the unique social and emotional needs of each student.
  • Goal-Oriented: They establish clear objectives for students’ social and emotional development, allowing for progress tracking.
  • Involvement of Stakeholders: ISEPs involve collaboration between school psychologists, educators, parents, and, at times, external mental health professionals.

C. Addressing the Needs of Diverse Learners through Social-Emotional Assessment

Social-Emotional Assessment is an essential tool for addressing the diverse needs of learners, acknowledging that students come from various cultural, linguistic, and socio-economic backgrounds. It allows school psychologists to assess how cultural factors impact students’ social and emotional development and tailor interventions accordingly.

Benefits:

  • Cultural Competency: Assessment results help school psychologists develop a culturally competent approach to addressing social and emotional needs.
  • Reducing Disparities: By considering cultural factors, assessment-driven interventions can help reduce disparities in social and emotional outcomes among diverse student groups.
  • Inclusive Practices: Social-Emotional Assessment fosters inclusive practices that respect and embrace the cultural richness of the student body.

Social-Emotional Assessment, when thoughtfully integrated into educational and counseling practices, contributes significantly to nurturing emotionally healthy and socially competent learners. Its applications extend beyond identifying challenges; it empowers educators and school psychologists to proactively create a nurturing and inclusive learning environment that fosters the social and emotional growth of all students.

V: Challenges, Ethical Considerations, and Future Trends

Social-Emotional Assessment in school psychology presents both opportunities and challenges. This section delves into the various challenges and limitations, ethical considerations, and emerging trends and innovations within the realm of Social-Emotional Assessment.

A. Challenges and Limitations of Social-Emotional Assessment in School Psychology

1. Cultural and Linguistic Diversity Considerations

Challenge: Cultural and linguistic diversity among students can pose significant challenges in Social-Emotional Assessment. Traditional assessment tools may not accurately capture the social and emotional experiences of students from diverse backgrounds. Differences in cultural norms, expressions of emotions, and communication styles may lead to misinterpretation or misdiagnosis.

Addressing the Challenge:

  • Culturally Sensitive Assessment: School psychologists must employ culturally sensitive assessment tools and methods that consider the unique cultural contexts of students.
  • Bilingual Assessors: When appropriate, having bilingual assessors available can facilitate more accurate assessments, especially when language barriers exist.
  • Family and Community Involvement: Engaging families and communities in the assessment process can provide valuable cultural insights and enhance the validity of assessments.

2. Potential for Bias and Stereotyping

Challenge: Bias and stereotyping can infiltrate the assessment process, leading to inaccurate results and potentially harmful consequences. Bias may stem from the assessor’s beliefs, cultural stereotypes, or preconceived notions about social and emotional behaviors, affecting both assessment procedures and interpretation.

Addressing the Challenge:

  • Training and Awareness: School psychologists and assessors should undergo regular training on cultural competence, bias reduction, and awareness of their own potential biases.
  • Standardized Procedures: Adhering to standardized assessment procedures helps mitigate the influence of bias by providing consistency in assessment administration.
  • Diverse Assessment Teams: Collaborating with diverse assessment teams can bring different perspectives and reduce the impact of individual biases.

B. Ethical Guidelines and Best Practices in Social-Emotional Assessment

1. Ensuring Informed Consent and Confidentiality

Ethical Consideration: Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical Social-Emotional Assessment. Students and their parents or guardians must be fully informed about the purpose of the assessment, its potential implications, and their right to refuse or provide consent. Moreover, ensuring confidentiality and data security is paramount to protect students’ privacy.

Best Practices:

  • Transparent Communication: School psychologists should communicate clearly and comprehensively with students and their families, providing all necessary information about the assessment.
  • Respecting Privacy: Strict protocols should be in place to protect assessment data and ensure that only authorized individuals have access to sensitive information.

2. Maintaining Ethical Conduct

Ethical Consideration: Ethical conduct in Social-Emotional Assessment involves upholding professional standards, maintaining objectivity, and avoiding conflicts of interest. School psychologists must prioritize the best interests of students and adhere to ethical guidelines outlined by professional organizations.

Best Practices:

  • Professional Development: Ongoing professional development and adherence to the ethical guidelines set by organizations like the American Psychological Association (APA) and the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) are essential.
  • Conflict of Interest Mitigation: School psychologists should avoid situations where personal or professional interests could compromise the integrity of the assessment process.

C. Emerging Trends and Innovations in Social-Emotional Assessment

1. Advances in Technology and Computer-Based Assessments

Trend: Technology continues to play a transformative role in Social-Emotional Assessment. Computer-based assessments, virtual reality, and digital tools enable more dynamic and interactive assessments. These innovations allow for real-time data collection, enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of assessments.

Implications:

  • Increased Accessibility: Technology-driven assessments can be more accessible to students with diverse needs, including those with disabilities.
  • Enhanced Data Analysis: Digital assessments often come with robust data analysis tools that help school psychologists interpret results more effectively.

2. Integrating Social-Emotional Assessment into Comprehensive Student Support

Trend: There is a growing recognition of the need to integrate Social-Emotional Assessment seamlessly into a broader framework of Comprehensive Student Support. This approach considers the social and emotional well-being of students as integral to their overall academic success. School psychologists collaborate with educators, counselors, and other professionals to provide holistic support.

Implications:

  • Preventative Measures: By identifying social and emotional challenges early, schools can implement preventative measures that promote a positive school climate and student well-being.
  • Inclusivity: Comprehensive Student Support ensures that the needs of all students, including those from diverse backgrounds, are addressed.

As Social-Emotional Assessment in school psychology continues to evolve, addressing challenges, adhering to ethical guidelines, and embracing emerging trends will be crucial. By doing so, school psychologists can enhance their ability to support students’ social and emotional development effectively, creating a nurturing and inclusive educational environment.

VI: Conclusion

A. Summary of Key Points Discussed in the Article

This article has explored the multifaceted domain of Social-Emotional Assessment in school psychology, delving into its theoretical foundations, assessment methods, applications, ethical considerations, and emerging trends. Here is a concise summary of the key points discussed:

  1. Theoretical Foundations: Social-Emotional Assessment draws from various theories, including Attachment Theory, Social Learning Theory, and Emotional Intelligence Theory. These theories inform assessment practices by providing insights into the social and emotional development of students.
  2. Assessment Methods: Various assessment tools, such as Behavior Rating Scales, Self-Report Questionnaires, and Observational Assessment, are employed to evaluate students’ social and emotional competencies. Ethical considerations, including informed consent and cultural sensitivity, guide the assessment process.
  3. Applications and Benefits: Social-Emotional Assessment plays a pivotal role in educational settings by identifying emotional and behavioral issues, supporting social and emotional learning (SEL), and guiding interventions. It aids in early intervention, prevention, and the development of individualized plans, fostering a holistic approach to education.
  4. Challenges and Limitations: Cultural and linguistic diversity pose challenges in assessment, requiring culturally sensitive tools and practices. Additionally, potential biases and stereotypes demand continuous training and awareness. Overcoming these challenges is essential to ensure accurate and equitable assessments.
  5. Ethical Considerations: Informed consent, confidentiality, and ethical conduct are integral to ethical Social-Emotional Assessment. Professionals must prioritize transparency, privacy protection, and adherence to ethical guidelines.
  6. Emerging Trends: Technology-driven assessments and integration with Comprehensive Student Support are shaping the future of Social-Emotional Assessment. Computer-based tools and a holistic approach are enhancing accessibility, data analysis, and overall effectiveness.

B. Emphasis on the Continued Significance and Relevance of Social-Emotional Assessment in School Psychology

As we conclude this exploration of Social-Emotional Assessment, it is essential to emphasize the continued significance and relevance of this field within school psychology. Social and emotional development is intrinsic to students’ overall well-being and academic success. Here are the reasons why Social-Emotional Assessment remains indispensable:

  1. Holistic Student Development: Social and emotional competencies are not separate from academic achievement but integral to it. By assessing and addressing students’ social and emotional needs, we promote holistic development.
  2. Prevention and Early Intervention: Social-Emotional Assessment allows for the early identification of issues and proactive intervention. It aids in preventing academic challenges, mental health issues, and behavioral problems.
  3. Equity and Inclusivity: Embracing cultural sensitivity and reducing biases in assessment ensures that all students, regardless of their background, receive equitable support. This contributes to a more inclusive educational environment.
  4. Comprehensive Support: Integration with Comprehensive Student Support acknowledges that students’ social and emotional well-being is intertwined with their academic journey. This approach encourages collaboration among professionals and emphasizes a student-centered approach.
  5. Ethical and Responsible Practice: Upholding ethical standards in Social-Emotional Assessment is not just a professional obligation; it is a moral imperative. It safeguards the rights and dignity of students and their families.

In an educational landscape that is constantly evolving, Social-Emotional Assessment remains a cornerstone of effective school psychology practice. As we look to the future, it is crucial to adapt to emerging trends, refine ethical practices, and continue prioritizing the social and emotional development of our students. By doing so, we empower them to thrive academically, emotionally, and socially, ultimately shaping a brighter future for all.

References:

  1. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). Basic Books.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
  3. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9(3), 185-211.
  4. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2015). Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) (3rd ed.). Pearson.
  5. Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337-1345.
  6. Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Psychology Press.
  7. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association.
  8. Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213-220.
  9. Gresham, F. M., Elliott, S. N., Vance, M. J., & Cook, C. R. (2011). Comparability of the Social Skills Rating System to the Social Skills Improvement System: Content and psychometric comparisons across elementary and secondary age levels. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(1), 27-44.
  10. Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (2007). Social skills improvement system rating scales. Pearson.
  11. Walker, H. M., Ramsey, E., & Gresham, F. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices (2nd ed.). Wadsworth.
  12. National Association of School Psychologists. (2017). Professional conduct manual. National Association of School Psychologists.
  13. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2014). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC-II). Pearson.
  14. Shriver, M. D., Allen, A. R., & Allen, B. (2015). Convergence and divergence of behavior rating scales with peer sociometric nomination measures in assessing the social status and behavior of elementary school children. Psychology in the Schools, 52(6), 544-559.
  15. Cohen, R., & Swerdlik, M. (2018). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement. McGraw-Hill Education.
  16. Merrell, K. W. (2013). Behavioral, social, and emotional assessment of children and adolescents (4th ed.). Routledge.
  17. Gabel, S. (2013). Handbook of school neuropsychology. Springer Science & Business Media.
  18. Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? Teachers College Press.
Scroll to Top