Suspension

Suspension is a disciplinary measure with profound implications for students’ psychological well-being and academic success. This article explores the theoretical foundations, psychological and academic impacts, and the myriad factors contributing to suspension in school settings. It delves into the influences of school policies, socioeconomic and demographic disparities, family dynamics, and community support. Additionally, it examines school-based interventions, legal and ethical considerations, and presents case studies showcasing successful alternatives. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to address suspension in school psychology, offering recommendations for future research, policy changes, and collaborative efforts to enhance student outcomes and ensure a just and equitable educational environment.

Introduction

Suspension, a disciplinary action commonly employed in school settings, represents a multifaceted issue within the field of school psychology. This introductory section aims to provide a foundational understanding of suspension, its prevalence, the purpose of this article, and the overarching thesis statement guiding our exploration.

Suspension refers to the temporary exclusion of a student from school, typically as a response to behavior that violates established school rules or codes of conduct. It entails the removal of a student from the educational environment for a specified duration, during which the student is prohibited from attending classes and participating in school-related activities. The practice of suspension varies in its severity, ranging from in-school suspension, where students remain on campus but are isolated from their peers, to out-of-school suspension, which involves students being banned from school premises for a designated period.

The prevalence of suspension as a disciplinary tool has been a matter of concern in the educational landscape. Research indicates that suspension is not uncommon, and its usage varies across schools, districts, and regions. Understanding the prevalence of suspension is essential for evaluating its impact and implementing effective interventions to address its implications on students’ psychological and academic well-being.

This article seeks to provide a comprehensive analysis of suspension within the context of school psychology. It aims to shed light on the various aspects of suspension, including its theoretical underpinnings, psychological and academic consequences, factors influencing its implementation, school-based interventions, and the legal and ethical considerations surrounding this disciplinary practice. Through an in-depth examination, this article aspires to contribute to a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of suspension in schools.

The central thesis of this article is that suspension is a disciplinary measure that warrants critical examination and reform within the realm of school psychology. This research will elucidate the psychological and academic impact of suspension on students, explore the complex factors influencing its use, evaluate existing interventions and alternatives, and emphasize the need for a holistic, equitable, and evidence-based approach to address suspension within educational settings. Ultimately, it contends that suspension, while sometimes necessary, must be wielded judiciously to ensure the well-being and educational success of all students.

Theoretical Framework

Suspension in school psychology can be comprehensively understood through various theoretical lenses that provide insight into its underlying dynamics, as well as the psychological factors contributing to this disciplinary measure.

Behaviorism, a fundamental theoretical perspective, posits that behavior is shaped by the consequences it produces. Within the context of suspension, this theory suggests that students may engage in behaviors leading to suspension due to the perceived rewards or consequences they anticipate. By analyzing behavior patterns and implementing behavior modification techniques, school psychologists can better understand and address the antecedents of suspension.

Social learning theory, propounded by Albert Bandura, underscores the importance of observational learning and modeling. Students may adopt behaviors leading to suspension through exposure to peers or authority figures. By examining the social context and peer influences, school psychologists can uncover the mechanisms through which social learning contributes to suspension.

Attachment theory, introduced by John Bowlby, focuses on the emotional bonds between individuals. It is particularly relevant in understanding how a lack of secure attachments or disruptions in caregiver relationships may manifest in student behavior. School psychologists can apply attachment theory to explore how unresolved attachment issues might lead to behavior patterns that result in suspension.

Externalizing behaviors are characterized by outward expressions of aggression, defiance, or rule-breaking. These behaviors are often associated with suspension, as they may disrupt the learning environment and pose safety concerns. School psychologists employ assessment tools and interventions to address externalizing behaviors and identify their underlying causes.

Internalizing behaviors involve inward-focused emotional struggles, such as depression, anxiety, and withdrawal. Although less visible than externalizing behaviors, internalizing behaviors can also lead to suspension, as they may impair a student’s ability to engage in school activities. School psychologists use diagnostic techniques to identify internalizing behaviors and provide appropriate interventions and support.

Emotional regulation plays a pivotal role in how students respond to stress, frustration, and conflict. Poor emotional regulation may lead to impulsive and disruptive behavior, increasing the likelihood of suspension. School psychologists work to enhance students’ emotional regulation skills, teaching coping strategies and resilience-building techniques.

By examining these theoretical perspectives and psychological factors, school psychologists can gain a deeper understanding of why suspension occurs, enabling the development of targeted interventions and strategies to address the root causes and mitigate its impact on students.

Impact of Suspension on Students

The consequences of suspension in school psychology extend far beyond the immediate disciplinary action, impacting students on multiple levels, including their psychological well-being, academic progress, and social development.

Suspended students often experience heightened levels of anxiety and stress due to the punitive nature of the disciplinary action. The uncertainty and isolation associated with suspension can contribute to these negative emotional states, affecting the overall mental health of students.

Suspension can erode a student’s self-esteem and self-concept. Being removed from the school environment and subjected to disciplinary measures may lead to feelings of inadequacy and a negative self-image.

The emotional consequences of suspension may linger long after the actual incident. Students may harbor resentment, anger, or a sense of injustice, which can impact their emotional well-being in the future.

Suspension disrupts the continuity of a student’s education, causing missed instruction and assignments. This disruption can make it difficult for students to keep up with their peers, leading to academic challenges.

Frequent or prolonged suspensions can contribute to achievement gaps, as suspended students often struggle to catch up with their peers. This gap in educational attainment can have long-lasting consequences.

Research has shown a correlation between repeated suspensions and increased dropout rates. Students who face suspension may become disengaged from school, leading to the decision to leave the educational system prematurely.

Suspended students may experience stigmatization from peers and teachers. They may be viewed as “troublemakers” or “problem students,” leading to negative stereotypes that can affect their social and academic interactions.

Suspension can strain peer relationships. Isolation from the school community and peers during suspension can disrupt social ties and friendships, leading to feelings of loneliness and exclusion.

Some research suggests a link between suspension and future delinquent behavior. Disconnected from school and without effective interventions, suspended students may be more likely to engage in risky or delinquent activities.

Understanding the wide-ranging effects of suspension on students is critical in the formulation of interventions and policies that promote a supportive and inclusive school environment. Addressing these impacts is crucial in ensuring the well-being and educational success of all students while minimizing the negative consequences of disciplinary actions.

School-Based Interventions and Alternatives

Recognizing the significant impact of suspension on students, school psychologists and educators have developed various interventions and alternative approaches aimed at reducing the need for suspension and fostering a more inclusive and supportive educational environment.

Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a proactive approach that focuses on teaching and reinforcing positive behaviors within the school community. It involves creating a school-wide system of clear expectations, providing rewards and recognition for positive behavior, and offering support for students who struggle to meet these expectations. PBIS aims to prevent behavioral issues and reduce the need for punitive measures like suspension.

Restorative justice practices emphasize accountability, repair, and healing. Instead of punitive discipline, restorative justice brings together those involved in an incident to engage in open dialogue, acknowledge the harm caused, and collectively work toward resolution and reconciliation. Restorative justice practices can help students understand the consequences of their actions and restore damaged relationships.

Comprehensive counseling and mental health services are essential for addressing the underlying emotional and psychological issues that may lead to behaviors warranting suspension. School counselors and mental health professionals can provide students with guidance, support, and coping strategies, helping them manage stress, anxiety, and emotional challenges effectively.

Alternative education programs are designed to provide suspended students with an educational setting that allows them to continue their studies. These programs offer a structured environment, smaller class sizes, and specialized instruction. Alternative education can help students maintain their academic progress while addressing behavioral issues.

Wraparound services involve a holistic approach that provides students and their families with comprehensive support. This may include academic, mental health, and social services, along with family counseling and community resources. Wraparound services address the complex needs of students and their families, promoting a nurturing environment for growth and development.

By implementing these school-based interventions and alternatives, educators and school psychologists can reduce the reliance on suspension as a disciplinary measure. These approaches promote a more supportive and inclusive school culture while addressing the underlying issues that often lead to student misbehavior. Furthermore, they empower students to learn from their mistakes, grow emotionally, and continue their academic journey in a more positive and constructive manner.

Case Studies and Examples

Examining real-world case studies and examples is crucial for understanding the practical application and implications of suspension-related interventions and legal actions. In this section, we will highlight successful interventions and demonstrate the impact of legal actions on the practice of suspension in school psychology.

Highlighting Successful Interventions:

1. Case Study 1: Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in an Urban High School In this case study, we explore an urban high school that successfully implemented PBIS as a proactive approach to behavior management. By defining clear expectations, reinforcing positive behavior, and providing support to struggling students, the school significantly reduced the number of suspensions. Students reported feeling more supported and engaged, and the school experienced improved overall behavior and a more positive school climate.
2. Case Study 2: Restorative Justice Practices in a Middle School This case study delves into a middle school that implemented restorative justice practices as an alternative to suspension. By engaging students in restorative circles, addressing conflicts through open dialogue, and focusing on resolution and accountability, the school witnessed a decrease in suspensions and a notable improvement in students’ problem-solving skills, empathy, and conflict resolution abilities.

Demonstrating the Impact of Legal Actions:

1. Legal Action 1: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) IDEA mandates that students with disabilities receive a free and appropriate public education, including those who exhibit challenging behaviors. We will discuss a legal case where IDEA was used to ensure that students with disabilities received necessary supports and accommodations rather than facing suspension. This legal action illustrates the importance of federal laws in protecting the rights of students with disabilities and promoting inclusive education.
2. Legal Action 2: Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Disparate Impact We will examine a legal case in which the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was used to address the issue of disparate impact of suspension policies on students from different racial and ethnic backgrounds. This legal action demonstrates the role of federal legislation in addressing disparities in disciplinary practices and promoting equity in education.

These case studies and legal examples showcase the practical application of interventions and the significant impact of legal actions in shaping the discourse around suspension in school psychology. They provide valuable insights into the success of alternative approaches and the role of legal safeguards in protecting the rights and well-being of students within the educational system.

Future Directions and Recommendations

As we move forward in addressing suspension in school psychology, it is imperative to consider future directions and recommendations that can contribute to a more equitable and effective educational system.

To address suspension in school settings, future efforts should prioritize evidence-based practices. This involves the rigorous evaluation of interventions, including those related to behavior management, restorative justice, and mental health support. Implementing programs and strategies with a proven track record of success can help reduce suspensions and promote positive student outcomes. Continued research and evaluation are essential to refine and expand the use of evidence-based practices.

Further research is necessary to better understand the complex factors influencing suspension and the outcomes for suspended students. Future studies should examine the long-term effects of suspension, delve into the experiences of specific student populations (e.g., students with disabilities, students of color), and explore the effectiveness of alternative interventions. Research can provide insights into the root causes of student misbehavior, the impact of various interventions, and the development of more targeted and culturally competent approaches to discipline.

Policy changes at both the federal and state levels are essential to promote equity in disciplinary practices. Policymakers should consider reforms to reduce the reliance on suspension and emphasize alternative approaches. This may include reviewing zero-tolerance policies, revising school codes of conduct, and aligning disciplinary practices with best practices in school psychology. Policy changes should also address the disproportionate impact of suspension on vulnerable student populations, such as students with disabilities and minority students.

Collaboration among educators, school psychologists, parents, and community organizations is critical to addressing suspension effectively. Schools should foster a multidisciplinary approach that involves school counselors, mental health professionals, and community resources. Training programs should be developed to enhance the cultural competence of educators and school psychologists to better address the diverse needs of students. Promoting collaboration and providing ongoing training can empower school staff to implement more inclusive and effective strategies.

In conclusion, the future of addressing suspension in school psychology should be marked by a commitment to evidence-based practices, robust research, policy changes that prioritize equity, and collaboration among stakeholders. By taking these steps, we can work toward a more supportive, inclusive, and effective educational system that fosters positive student behavior, emotional well-being, and academic success while minimizing the need for punitive disciplinary actions like suspension.

Conclusion

In closing, this comprehensive analysis has explored the multifaceted issue of suspension in the context of school psychology. The examination of suspension, its theoretical foundations, psychological impacts, factors contributing to its implementation, and various interventions and alternatives has shed light on the critical need to address this disciplinary measure. The following points summarize the key takeaways:

Recap of Key Points:

• Suspension is the temporary exclusion of students from school in response to behavior violations.
• It is prevalent in school settings and can have profound psychological, academic, and social consequences for students.
• Theoretical frameworks, including behaviorism, social learning theory, and attachment theory, provide insights into the dynamics of suspension.
• Externalizing and internalizing behaviors, along with emotional regulation, play a crucial role in student misbehavior and suspension.
• Effective interventions, such as PBIS and restorative justice, can reduce the need for suspension.
• Legal actions and federal laws, such as IDEA and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, can protect students’ rights and promote equity.

The significance of addressing suspension in school psychology cannot be overstated. As demonstrated throughout this article, suspension has far-reaching effects on students, their well-being, and their educational journeys. It is essential to recognize that suspension is not solely a disciplinary matter but a complex issue deeply intertwined with the overall health and equity of the educational system. By addressing suspension effectively, we can create a school environment that not only fosters academic growth but also supports the social and emotional development of all students.

To truly address suspension in school psychology, we must adopt holistic, student-centered approaches. This involves a commitment to evidence-based practices, ongoing research, policy reforms that prioritize equity, and collaboration among educators, school psychologists, parents, and community organizations. By implementing interventions that nurture positive behavior, provide emotional and mental health support, and offer inclusive education, we can reduce the need for punitive measures like suspension. The goal is to create an educational system where every student has the opportunity to thrive, and where misbehavior is addressed through supportive and constructive means, ultimately leading to improved student outcomes and a more just and inclusive learning environment.

References:

1. Anderson, A. R. (2018). The psychological impact of school suspension on students. Journal of School Psychology, 68, 66-76.
2. Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Examining the effects of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12(3), 133-148.
3. Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59-68.
4. Losen, D. J., Hodson, C. L., Keith, M. A., & Morrison, K. (2015). Are we closing the school discipline gap? (Research Report). The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, UCLA.
5. Morrison, G. M., & Skiba, R. J. (2001). Replication and extension of the School-Wide Evaluation Tool (SET) for examining behavior support in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3(3), 145-151.
6. Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C. G., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85-107.
7. Waasdorp, T. E., Pas, E. T., O’Brennan, L. M., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2011). A multilevel perspective on the climate of bullying and peer victimization: Prevalence and consequences. Journal of School Psychology, 49(5), 515-532.
8. Gagnon, J. C., & Barber, B. R. (2017). “I don’t feel like I belong at school”: The relation between perceived school safety and sense of school belonging. Journal of School Violence, 16(1), 42-61.
9. Morrison, G. M., Robertson, L., Laurie, K., & Kratz, H. E. (2015). School climate, violence exposure, and dropout: A multi‐level analysis. School Psychology Review, 44(3), 306-316.
10. Skiba, R. J., Arredondo, M. I., & Williams, N. T. (2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(4), 546-564.
11. Benbenishty, R., & Astor, R. A. (2005). School violence in context: Culture, neighborhood, family, school, and gender. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Dupper, D. R., & Montgomery, K. L. (2013). Zero tolerance policies in schools: Issues and implications. Social Work, 58(2), 173-182.
13. Roffman, E. M., & Borchardt, A. E. (2015). Alternative schooling and school disengagement among students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 23(4), 203-216.
14. Skiba, R. J., & Peterson, R. L. (2000). School discipline at a crossroads: From zero tolerance to early response. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 335-347.
15. Yarbrough, P., & Bennett, B. (2012). Promoting alternatives to suspension and expulsion in Georgia: Policies and practices that work. Georgia Appleseed.
16. Benbenishty, R., & Astor, R. A. (2017). School violence in an international context: A 30-year research agenda. School Psychology International, 38(2), 109-125.
17. Fabelo, T., Thompson, M. D., Plotkin, M., Carmichael, D., Marchbanks, M. P., & Booth, E. A. (2011). Breaking schools’ rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. Council of State Governments Justice Center.
18. Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., Nardo, A. C., & Peterson, R. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34(4), 317-342.
19. Krezmien, M. P., Leone, P. E., Achilles, G. M., & Osher, D. (2010). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18(2), 101-112.
20. Rausch, M. K., Skiba, R. J., & Simmons, A. B. (2004). The academic cost of discipline: The relationship between suspension/expulsion and school achievement. Journal of School Violence, 4(2), 27-44.