This article examines the nuanced landscape of suspect interrogation methods within the framework of the United States criminal justice process. Beginning with a historical exploration, the narrative unfolds the evolution of interrogation techniques, from early practices involving lie detector tests and physical coercion to pivotal legal and ethical developments such as the landmark Miranda v.
The interrogation of those suspected of wrongdoing, although of great importance to society, has not been researched extensively compared with other crucial topics in psychology and law. Effective interrogation (and therefore the prosecution and possible conviction) of guilty persons is of obvious and high relevance to this encyclopedia, as is the successful interviewing of those
Interrogation rooms remain some of the most secretive locations in the United States legal system. Police undertake interrogation to discover the truth about a crime. Police, along with society at large, want guilty people to confess and innocent people to resist. The stakes are particularly high because a confession is even more powerful than eyewitness
A police interrogation involves a police officer interviewing someone who is believed to have committed a crime. The officer who conducts the interview is often called an interrogator, and the person being interviewed is commonly referred to as a suspect. The evidence pointing to the guilt of the suspect can range from mere suspicion to
Interrogation rooms remain some of the most secretive locations in the United States legal system. Police undertake interrogation to discover the truth about a crime. Police, along with society at large, want guilty people to confess and innocent people to resist. The stakes are particularly high because a confession is even more powerful than eyewitness
The interrogation of those suspected of wrongdoing, although of great importance to society, has not been researched extensively compared with other crucial topics in psychology and law. Effective interrogation (and therefore the prosecution and possible conviction) of guilty persons is of obvious and high relevance to police psychology and forensic psychology as is the successful interviewing