Functional Behavioral Assessment

Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) is a pivotal practice in school psychology, designed to understand and address challenging behaviors among students. This comprehensive article explores the evolution and significance of Functional Behavioral Assessment, rooted in theoretical foundations such as behavioral theory and Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). It delves into the methods and procedures involved in conducting FBA, including the role of direct observation and technology. Additionally, it discusses the practical applications of FBA, notably in developing Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs) and Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). Challenges, ethical considerations, and emerging trends in FBA are also addressed, highlighting its enduring importance in school psychology.

Introduction

Definition and Significance of Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) in School Psychology

Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) is a vital component of school psychology, playing a pivotal role in understanding and addressing challenging behaviors exhibited by students in educational settings. FBA is a systematic and collaborative approach used to determine the underlying functions or purposes of a student’s problem behavior. These behaviors may range from disruptive actions in the classroom to social withdrawal, and FBA seeks to uncover the reasons behind them. Significantly, FBA is not merely about identifying the problem behavior but understanding why it occurs, which is a crucial step towards effective intervention.

The significance of FBA in school psychology lies in its ability to guide educators, school psychologists, and other professionals in developing targeted and evidence-based strategies to support students with challenging behaviors. By uncovering the root causes of these behaviors, FBA helps create more inclusive and supportive learning environments. It enables educators to move beyond punitive measures and instead implement interventions that address the underlying needs of students. This not only improves behavior but also enhances overall academic and social outcomes, fostering a positive educational experience for all students.

Historical Context: Evolution and Development of Functional Behavioral Assessment

The roots of FBA can be traced back to the field of applied behavior analysis (ABA) and behavior therapy, which emerged in the mid-20th century. Early pioneers such as B.F. Skinner and Ivar Lovaas laid the foundation for understanding behavior as a product of environmental factors and reinforcement principles. These foundational ideas gradually found their way into educational settings, leading to the development of FBA as a systematic approach to address behavioral challenges.

The passage of landmark legislation in the United States, including the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (1975) and its successor, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, 1990), played a pivotal role in shaping the development of FBA. These laws emphasized the importance of providing a free and appropriate public education to all students, including those with disabilities. Consequently, there was a growing recognition that addressing challenging behaviors required a more systematic and evidence-based approach.

As a result, FBA gained prominence in the 1980s and 1990s as a legally mandated process for students with disabilities under IDEA. The subsequent reauthorization of IDEA in 1997 further solidified FBA’s place in special education. Over the years, FBA has evolved, incorporating principles from behavior analysis, psychology, and education, and has expanded its application to various educational settings and student populations.

Overview of the Article’s Objectives and Structure

This article aims to provide a comprehensive exploration of Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) in the context of school psychology. It will delve into the theoretical foundations, methodologies, practical applications, challenges, ethical considerations, and future trends related to FBA. The structure of the article is organized into distinct sections to facilitate a thorough understanding of this critical topic.

By the end of this article, readers will gain insights into the historical development, theoretical underpinnings, practical implementation, and the ever-evolving role of FBA in promoting positive behavioral outcomes in educational settings.

Theoretical Foundations of Functional Behavioral Assessment

Explanation of Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) and its Key Concepts

Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) is a systematic problem-solving process used in school psychology to understand and address challenging behaviors exhibited by students in educational settings. At its core, FBA seeks to uncover the “function” or purpose of a student’s problem behavior. This concept is grounded in the belief that behaviors, including challenging ones, serve specific functions or fulfill certain needs for individuals. To conduct an effective FBA, several key concepts must be understood:

Behavioral Function: This is the central concept of FBA. It refers to the underlying purpose or reason for a student’s behavior. Behaviors can serve various functions, such as seeking attention, escaping tasks, obtaining tangible items, or self-stimulation. Identifying the function is crucial because it guides intervention strategies.
Antecedents: Antecedents are events or circumstances that occur before the problem behavior. They trigger or set the occasion for the behavior to occur. Antecedent factors can be environmental, social, or internal, and recognizing them helps predict when the behavior is likely to happen.
Behavior: This represents the specific actions or responses of concern. These behaviors are observable and measurable. FBA focuses on defining and describing the problem behavior in detail to ensure accuracy in assessment.
Consequences: Consequences are events or outcomes that follow the problem behavior. They may reinforce or maintain the behavior, influencing its future occurrence. Understanding the consequences helps identify whether the behavior serves a specific purpose for the student.
ABC Analysis: FBA often employs an ABC analysis format, where A stands for antecedents, B for behavior, and C for consequences. This format systematically examines the events preceding and following the problem behavior to identify patterns and potential functions.

Theoretical Frameworks Underlying Functional Behavioral Assessment

Behavioral Theory: FBA is rooted in behavioral theory, which posits that behavior is learned and influenced by the environment. Key principles of behavioral theory, such as operant conditioning, reinforcement, and punishment, inform the practice of FBA. According to this perspective, behaviors are shaped by their consequences. If a behavior results in favorable outcomes (reinforcement), it is more likely to recur, while behaviors leading to unfavorable outcomes (punishment) are less likely to occur.
Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA): ABA is a systematic and evidence-based approach to understanding and modifying behavior. It serves as a foundational framework for FBA. ABA principles emphasize the importance of conducting objective and systematic assessments to identify the function of behavior. These principles include:
- Functional Analysis: ABA emphasizes conducting functional analyses to pinpoint the specific function of problem behavior. This involves systematically manipulating antecedents and consequences to determine their impact on the behavior.
- Reinforcement: ABA recognizes the power of reinforcement in influencing behavior. It distinguishes between positive reinforcement (providing a reward to increase a behavior) and negative reinforcement (removing an aversive stimulus to increase a behavior). Understanding reinforcement is critical in designing effective interventions.
- Data Collection: ABA places a strong emphasis on data collection and measurement. Data are collected to track behavior over time, evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and make data-driven decisions.

How These Theories Inform the Practice of FBA in School Psychology

The theoretical foundations of FBA, grounded in behavioral theory and ABA, have significant implications for its practice in school psychology:

Individualized Assessment: FBA recognizes that each student is unique, and their behaviors must be understood within their specific context. Behavioral theory emphasizes the importance of individualized assessment to identify the unique functions of behaviors for each student.
Evidence-Based Practices: ABA principles emphasize the use of evidence-based practices in assessment and intervention. School psychologists conducting FBA rely on empirical evidence to guide their decision-making, ensuring that interventions are based on scientific research.
Data-Driven Decision-Making: Both behavioral theory and ABA stress the importance of data collection and analysis. School psychologists systematically collect data to understand behavior patterns, evaluate interventions, and make informed decisions to support students.
Function-Based Interventions: FBA informs the development of function-based interventions. Once the function of behavior is identified, interventions are designed to address the underlying need or purpose. This approach is more effective than simply suppressing the behavior.

In summary, the theoretical foundations of FBA provide a solid framework for understanding and addressing challenging behaviors in school psychology. By applying principles from behavioral theory and ABA, school psychologists can conduct systematic assessments, develop evidence-based interventions, and promote positive behavioral outcomes for students.

Methods and Procedures for Conducting Functional Behavioral Assessment

Overview of the Functional Behavioral Assessment Process

Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) is a systematic process used by school psychologists to understand the underlying functions of problem behaviors in students. The FBA process consists of several key steps, beginning with the identification of the problem behavior:

Problem Behavior Identification: The FBA process starts with clearly defining and describing the problem behavior. School psychologists work closely with teachers, parents, and other stakeholders to gather information about the behavior’s frequency, intensity, duration, and the specific circumstances in which it occurs.
Setting Clear Objectives: Once the problem behavior is identified, the FBA team sets clear objectives for the assessment. These objectives include understanding the function of the behavior, identifying antecedents (triggers), and analyzing consequences.
Data Collection: Data collection is a fundamental component of FBA. School psychologists use various methods to collect data, including direct observation, interviews, behavior rating scales, and checklists. The data help establish patterns and potential triggers for the behavior.

Detailed Explanation of Functional Behavioral Assessment Techniques

Functional Analysis: Functional analysis is a systematic process within FBA used to determine the function of a problem behavior accurately. It involves manipulating antecedents and consequences in a controlled environment to observe how changes affect the behavior. Functional analysis typically consists of four conditions:
- Attention: The behavior is followed by attention from others.
- Escape: The behavior allows the student to escape or avoid a task or situation.
- Access to Tangibles: The behavior results in access to desired items or activities.
- Sensory Stimulation: The behavior provides sensory stimulation or self-soothing.
By systematically testing these conditions, school psychologists can identify the primary function(s) of the behavior.
Direct Observation: Direct observation is a commonly used method in FBA. School psychologists and trained observers directly monitor the student’s behavior in the natural environment. This involves recording the behavior, antecedents, and consequences as they occur. Observers use structured observation tools and checklists to ensure systematic data collection. Direct observation provides valuable insights into the contextual factors surrounding the behavior.
Functional Assessment Interviews: School psychologists conduct interviews with teachers, parents, and the student (if appropriate) to gather information about the problem behavior. Structured interviews focus on identifying triggers, patterns, and potential functions of the behavior. Information from multiple sources helps build a comprehensive understanding of the behavior.

Discussion of the Use of Technology and Tools in FBA

Advancements in technology have enhanced the methods and procedures for conducting Functional Behavioral Assessment:

Data Collection Software: School psychologists now have access to data collection software and apps that streamline the process of recording and analyzing behavior. These tools allow for real-time data entry, graphing, and trend analysis, making it easier to identify patterns and trends in behavior.
Functional Assessment Apps: Some apps are specifically designed for conducting functional assessments. These apps guide school psychologists through the FBA process, from defining the behavior to analyzing the data. They often include features for graphing and generating reports.
Video Recording: Video recording technology is valuable for capturing the behavior as it occurs. School psychologists can review the footage to gain a better understanding of antecedents, consequences, and the behavior itself. Video analysis tools help in identifying subtle behavioral nuances.
Functional Analysis Technology: Technology has also facilitated functional analysis by allowing for precise control of antecedents and consequences in virtual environments. Simulations and virtual tools enable school psychologists to conduct functional analyses more safely and efficiently.

Incorporating technology and tools into FBA procedures can enhance data accuracy, streamline the assessment process, and provide more detailed insights into the functions of problem behaviors. However, it’s essential to ensure that the use of technology aligns with ethical guidelines and respects student privacy.

Overall, the methods and procedures for conducting Functional Behavioral Assessment are systematic and data-driven. By employing techniques such as functional analysis, direct observation, and leveraging technology, school psychologists can gain a comprehensive understanding of problem behaviors and develop effective intervention strategies based on their functions.

Applications and Benefits of Functional Behavioral Assessment

How FBA Contributes to Understanding and Addressing Challenging Behaviors in School Settings

Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) plays a pivotal role in school psychology by contributing to the understanding and effective management of challenging behaviors in educational settings. Its applications are multifaceted, and its benefits are evident in several key areas:

Problem Behavior Analysis: FBA helps school psychologists systematically analyze problem behaviors to determine their underlying functions. By identifying whether a behavior serves as a means to gain attention, escape tasks, access desired items, or seek sensory stimulation, educators and school psychologists can tailor interventions that directly target the function, thereby reducing or eliminating the behavior.
Individualized Understanding: FBA recognizes that each student is unique, and their behaviors are context-specific. It allows school psychologists to gain an individualized understanding of why a particular behavior occurs for a specific student. This personalized approach is crucial for effective intervention planning.
Evidence-Based Decision-Making: FBA is grounded in empirical research and principles of applied behavior analysis (ABA). This evidence-based approach ensures that interventions are based on a solid foundation of behavioral science, increasing the likelihood of success in addressing challenging behaviors.
Early Intervention: FBA can be applied to assess behaviors at an early stage, allowing school psychologists to intervene proactively. Early identification and intervention can prevent the escalation of challenging behaviors, ultimately improving the student’s educational experience.

Use of FBA in Developing Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs) and Individualized Education Programs (IEPs)

Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs): FBA serves as the foundation for developing Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs), which are tailored strategies designed to address and manage challenging behaviors. BIPs are individualized and include specific interventions, goals, and strategies aimed at reducing the problem behavior and promoting positive alternatives. By directly targeting the function of the behavior, BIPs are more likely to be effective in producing meaningful behavior change.
Individualized Education Programs (IEPs): In special education, students with disabilities often have Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) that outline their unique educational needs and services. FBA informs the development of IEPs by providing critical data on the student’s behavior and the interventions required to support their learning. This ensures that educational plans are tailored to the student’s specific behavioral and academic needs.
Collaboration: FBA encourages collaboration among school psychologists, educators, parents, and other relevant stakeholders. Developing BIPs and IEPs requires a team approach, where everyone works together to understand the student’s behavior and create effective plans. Collaboration ensures that interventions are consistent across different settings and that everyone is aligned in their efforts to support the student.

Addressing the Needs of Diverse Learners and Students with Disabilities Through FBA

Cultural Sensitivity: FBA recognizes the importance of cultural competence in understanding and addressing challenging behaviors. School psychologists conducting FBA take into account cultural factors that may influence a student’s behavior. This cultural sensitivity ensures that assessments and interventions are culturally responsive and respectful of the student’s background.
Inclusive Practices: FBA promotes inclusive educational practices by addressing the diverse needs of students, including those with disabilities. By conducting FBA, school psychologists can identify how environmental factors may impact a student’s behavior. This information helps in making necessary accommodations and modifications to the learning environment to support students with disabilities effectively.
Individualized Support: Students with disabilities often have unique behavioral challenges that require individualized support. FBA enables school psychologists to identify the specific functions of problem behaviors for these students and develop targeted interventions that address their needs. This individualized approach is fundamental to ensuring that students with disabilities receive appropriate support to succeed in school.

In summary, Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) is a valuable tool in school psychology that contributes to understanding, addressing, and managing challenging behaviors in educational settings. Its applications include problem behavior analysis, individualized understanding, evidence-based decision-making, and early intervention. FBA informs the development of Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs) and Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) and promotes collaboration among stakeholders. Additionally, FBA addresses the diverse needs of learners, including those with disabilities, by incorporating cultural sensitivity and individualized support into assessment and intervention practices.

Challenges, Ethical Considerations, and Future Trends

Challenges and Limitations of FBA in School Psychology

While Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) offers substantial benefits in understanding and addressing challenging behaviors, it is not without its challenges and limitations:

Resource Intensity: Conducting FBA can be resource-intensive. It requires trained professionals to collect and analyze data, which may strain already limited resources in schools. Smaller schools or those with tight budgets may find it challenging to implement FBA comprehensively.
Time Constraints: FBA typically involves an extensive data collection period, which may not align with the urgency of addressing certain behaviors. In some cases, waiting for the FBA process to conclude may result in lost time for intervention.
Complex Behaviors: Some behaviors are inherently complex, and their functions may not be easy to determine. FBA may struggle to provide clear insights into multifaceted behaviors that have multiple antecedents and consequences.
Generalization: FBA is often conducted within specific settings, and its findings may not always generalize to other environments. Translating the results of FBA into effective interventions across various settings can be challenging.

Ethical Guidelines and Potential Biases in Conducting FBA

Ethical considerations are paramount in the practice of Functional Behavioral Assessment. School psychologists and educators must adhere to ethical guidelines to ensure the process is conducted ethically and without biases:

Informed Consent: Ethical practice requires obtaining informed consent from parents or guardians before conducting FBA on a student. This ensures transparency and respects the rights of the student and their family.
Cultural Competence: School psychologists must be culturally competent and aware of potential biases in the assessment process. Cultural biases in FBA can lead to misinterpretations of behavior and inappropriate interventions.
Confidentiality: FBA involves collecting sensitive information about a student’s behavior. It is crucial to maintain strict confidentiality to protect the student’s privacy.
Least Restrictive Alternatives: Ethical practice mandates considering the least restrictive alternatives when developing interventions based on FBA findings. The goal is to support positive behavior change without unnecessarily restricting a student’s freedom.

Emerging Trends and the Future of Functional Behavioral Assessment

The future of Functional Behavioral Assessment in school psychology is shaped by emerging trends and a growing emphasis on data-driven decision-making:

Advancements in Technology: Technology continues to play a significant role in FBA. Mobile applications and digital tools for data collection and analysis streamline the process, making it more accessible and efficient.
Big Data and Predictive Analytics: The integration of big data and predictive analytics offers opportunities to enhance FBA. These techniques can identify patterns and trends in behavior, helping school psychologists make more accurate predictions and develop tailored interventions.
Preventative Approaches: The future of FBA may see a shift towards preventative approaches. Rather than solely focusing on addressing problem behaviors, FBA could increasingly be used to identify early signs of behavioral challenges, allowing for proactive interventions.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Collaborative efforts between school psychologists, educators, special education professionals, and other stakeholders are likely to increase. This interdisciplinary approach ensures a comprehensive understanding of behavior and the development of effective interventions.
Data-Driven Decision-Making: FBA aligns with the broader trend of data-driven decision-making in education. School systems are increasingly using data to inform instructional practices, and FBA contributes to this by providing valuable behavioral data.

In conclusion, Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) faces challenges related to resource intensity, time constraints, and the complexity of behaviors. Ethical considerations, including informed consent, cultural competence, and confidentiality, are essential in conducting FBA without biases. The future of FBA in school psychology includes advancements in technology, the use of big data and predictive analytics, a focus on preventative approaches, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a continued emphasis on data-driven decision-making to support positive behavior change and enhance educational outcomes for all students.

Conclusion

Summary of Key Points Discussed

In this comprehensive exploration of Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) in school psychology, several key points emerge:

Definition and Significance: FBA is a systematic process for understanding the function of challenging behaviors in students. It holds great significance in promoting positive behavior change, fostering a supportive learning environment, and enhancing the educational experience of students.
Theoretical Foundations: FBA draws on behavioral theory and Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) principles, grounding its practice in well-established psychological frameworks. These theories inform the assessment and intervention strategies employed in FBA.
Methods and Procedures: Various methods and techniques, including direct observation, functional analysis, and data collection tools, play a central role in FBA. The process is structured and systematic, ensuring a thorough understanding of behavior.
Applications and Benefits: FBA contributes to understanding and addressing challenging behaviors in school settings. It aids in the development of Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs) and Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), facilitating targeted support for students with behavioral challenges. Moreover, FBA promotes inclusivity and addresses the needs of diverse learners and students with disabilities.
Challenges and Ethical Considerations: Challenges such as resource intensity and time constraints are inherent in FBA. Ethical guidelines, including informed consent and cultural competence, guide the practice of FBA and ensure fairness and respect for students’ rights and privacy.
Future Trends: The future of FBA in school psychology is marked by technological advancements, the integration of big data and predictive analytics, a shift towards preventative approaches, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a continued emphasis on data-driven decision-making.

Emphasis on the Continued Significance and Relevance of Functional Behavioral Assessment in School Psychology

As we conclude this exploration of FBA, it becomes evident that FBA remains an indispensable tool in the field of school psychology. Its significance lies in its capacity to transform challenging behaviors into opportunities for growth and development. By systematically uncovering the functions of behaviors, FBA empowers educators and school psychologists to create tailored interventions that support students in achieving their full potential.

The continued relevance of FBA is underscored by its alignment with the evolving landscape of education. In an era where data-driven decision-making and evidence-based practices are central to educational planning, FBA provides a structured and empirical approach to addressing behavioral challenges. Its adaptability to various educational settings, from elementary schools to special education programs, ensures that diverse student populations can benefit from its insights.

Furthermore, FBA embodies the ethical principles of transparency, fairness, and respect for individual differences. By adhering to ethical guidelines and promoting cultural competence, FBA contributes not only to behavior change but also to the creation of inclusive and respectful learning environments.

In a future marked by technological advancements and the ever-growing need for effective educational support, Functional Behavioral Assessment stands as a beacon of hope for students facing behavioral challenges. It is a reminder that understanding behavior is the first step towards fostering positive change and providing every student with the opportunity to thrive academically and socially. In school psychology, the significance and relevance of FBA are enduring, making it an indispensable tool for the betterment of education and the well-being of students.

References:

Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2019). Applied Behavior Analysis for Teachers. Pearson.
Chafouleas, S. M., & Bray, M. A. (2019). Multi-tiered systems of support and positive behavioral interventions and supports: A theoretical, empirical, and practical perspective. Routledge.
Cook, B. G., & Schirmer, B. R. (2003). What is special about special education for students with emotional or behavioral disorders? Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 148-156.
Dunlap, G., Sailor, W., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Lewis, T. J. (2010). Overview and history of positive behavior support. In Handbook of Positive Behavior Support (pp. 3-18). Springer.
Ervin, R. A., Radford, P. M., Bertsch, K. L., Piper, R. L., & Jones, T. F. (2010). Current practices of functional behavioral assessment in four southern states. Behavioral Disorders, 36(1), 4-18.
Gresham, F. M. (2007). Response to intervention: An alternative means of identifying students as emotionally disturbed. Education and Treatment of Children, 30(4), 181-194.
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165-179.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2), 197-209.
Kern, L., Bambara, L. M., & Fogt, J. (2002). Classwide curricular modification to improve the behavior of students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(2), 130-140.
Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2000). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the Procedural and Coding Manual of Division 16 and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(4), 389-407.
Lewis, T. J., Scott, T. M., & Sugai, G. (1994). Alternative educational delivery systems: Implications for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 19(3), 170-179.
Magee, S. K., & Ellis, J. T. (2002). Function-based interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A systematic review. Behavioral Disorders, 27(4), 327-344.
McIntosh, K., Horner, R. H., Chard, D. J., Boland, J. B., & Good, R. H. (2006). The use of reading and behavior screening measures to predict nonresponse to school-wide positive behavior support: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Review, 35(2), 275-291.
National Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2019). Implementing positive behavioral interventions and supports in schools: A guide to effective practice. US Department of Education.
O’Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. Cengage Learning.
Odom, S. L., & Brown, W. H. (2000). Setting effects on peer social interactions of young children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 473-490.
Shapiro, E. S., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2000). Conducting school-based assessments of child and adolescent behavior. Guilford Press.
Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Hieneman, M., Lewis, T. J., Nelson, C. M., … & Ruef, M. (2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(3), 131-143.
Van Acker, R., Boreson, L., & Gable, R. A. (2005). The challenging behaviors in education: Evidence-based practices. Wadsworth Publishing.
Walker, H. M., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague, J. R., Bricker, D., & Kaufman, M. J. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4(4), 194-209.
Walker, H. M., Ramsey, E., & Gresham, F. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices. Cengage Learning.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.
Wilson, T. P., & Daly, E. J. (2004). Recent developments in functional assessment. The Behavior Analyst Today, 5(2), 123-132.
Witt, J. C., Daly, E. M., & Noell, G. H. (2000). Functional assessment: A step-by-step guide to solving academic and behavior problems. Guilford Press.
Zirkel, P. A., & Thomas, L. B. (2010). State laws on special education evaluations and reevaluations. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(2), 73-86.
Zirkel, P. A., & Thomas, L. B. (2011). Special education and response to intervention: Sorting out the relationship. Exceptional Children, 77(3), 317-334.