Portfolio assessment is a versatile and informative method for evaluating student learning and achievement in school psychology. This comprehensive article explores the historical development, theoretical foundations, design principles, and diverse applications of portfolio assessment. We delve into its role in tracking progress, enhancing formative assessment, and promoting reflective teaching, all while addressing the needs of diverse learners. Ethical considerations and emerging trends, including digital portfolios, are also examined. This article underscores the enduring importance of portfolio assessment in school psychology, offering valuable insights into student growth and learning.
I. Introduction
A. Definition and Significance of Portfolio Assessment in School Psychology
Portfolio assessment, within the realm of school psychology, is a multifaceted method for systematically collecting, documenting, and evaluating evidence of a student’s learning, growth, and achievements over time (O’Malley & Valdez Pierce, 1996). It involves the intentional compilation of diverse artifacts, reflective narratives, and assessments that provide a comprehensive view of a student’s educational journey (Paulson, Paulson, & Meyer, 1991). Significantly, portfolio assessment moves beyond traditional forms of assessment, such as standardized testing, by emphasizing the holistic understanding of a student’s abilities, progress, and development (Cambridge, Cambridge, & Yancey, 2001).
The significance of portfolio assessment in school psychology lies in its potential to offer a more nuanced and authentic perspective on student learning (Gonzalez & Kuenzi, 2012). It aligns with the principles of formative assessment, focusing on continuous feedback and self-regulation (Black & Wiliam, 1998). By allowing students to actively engage in their learning process and reflect on their experiences, portfolio assessment encourages metacognition and the development of essential skills, such as critical thinking, self-assessment, and goal setting (Paris & Ayres, 1994). Furthermore, it promotes a student-centered approach to education, where learners take an active role in shaping their educational pathways.
B. Historical Context: Evolution and Development of Portfolio Assessment
The roots of portfolio assessment can be traced back to the early 20th century when educators and psychologists recognized the limitations of traditional assessment methods in capturing the richness of student learning (Paulson et al., 1991). However, the formal development and widespread adoption of portfolio assessment in educational contexts gained momentum in the latter part of the 20th century.
The process of portfolio assessment has evolved alongside shifts in educational philosophy and the recognition of the importance of a holistic view of student development (Cambridge et al., 2001). Educators and psychologists increasingly acknowledged the limitations of relying solely on high-stakes testing and recognized the value of documenting a broader range of student achievements, including their growth in non-academic domains such as social, emotional, and ethical development (Gonzalez & Kuenzi, 2012).
Throughout its history, portfolio assessment has been influenced by various educational reform movements, including the outcomes-based education movement in the 1980s and 1990s, which emphasized measuring student performance against explicit educational objectives (Paulson et al., 1991). Additionally, the advent of digital technologies in recent decades has transformed the way portfolios are created, shared, and assessed, opening up new possibilities for their use in school psychology (Cambridge et al., 2001).
C. Overview of the Article’s Objectives and Structure
This comprehensive article aims to provide a thorough exploration of portfolio assessment in the field of school psychology. It is structured to offer readers a holistic understanding of this assessment approach, covering its historical development, theoretical foundations, design principles, and versatile applications.
In the following sections, we will delve into the theoretical foundations that underpin portfolio assessment, exploring how cognitive learning theories, constructivist approaches, and situated learning theory inform the practice of portfolio assessment (Paris & Ayres, 1994). We will also discuss the key considerations when designing portfolio assessment models, emphasizing the importance of setting clear objectives, developing appropriate assessment tools, and ensuring effective data collection and analysis (Gonzalez & Kuenzi, 2012).
Subsequent sections will highlight the diverse applications of portfolio assessment, including its role in tracking student progress, enhancing formative assessment, promoting reflective teaching practices, and accommodating the needs of diverse learners (Black & Wiliam, 1998). Ethical considerations in portfolio assessment will also be addressed, ensuring that the practice aligns with the principles of fairness, confidentiality, and equity (O’Malley & Valdez Pierce, 1996).
Finally, we will explore emerging trends in portfolio assessment, particularly the integration of digital portfolios and their potential to revolutionize the way students and educators engage with this assessment method (Cambridge et al., 2001). Throughout the article, we will underscore the enduring significance of portfolio assessment in school psychology, emphasizing its ability to provide valuable insights into student growth and learning.
II. Theoretical Foundations of Portfolio Assessment
A. Explanation of Portfolio Assessment
Portfolio assessment is a dynamic and multifaceted approach to evaluating student learning and development, encompassing the systematic collection, curation, and reflection on a diverse array of student-generated artifacts and evidence of their accomplishments (Paulson, Paulson, & Meyer, 1991). It stands in stark contrast to traditional assessment methods, such as standardized tests, by emphasizing the importance of process and growth rather than mere product or outcome (Gonzalez & Kuenzi, 2012). In essence, a portfolio is a purposeful compilation of a student’s work that reflects their learning journey, achievements, and the development of various skills and competencies (Cambridge, Cambridge, & Yancey, 2001).
The core philosophy of portfolio assessment revolves around the belief that learning is an active, constructive, and reflective process, driven by the learner’s interaction with meaningful tasks, real-world challenges, and opportunities for self-assessment (Paulson et al., 1991). As such, portfolio assessment aligns with the principles of constructivist learning theories, authentic assessment, and reflective practice, which collectively inform its design and implementation in educational contexts (Black & Wiliam, 1998).
B. Theoretical Frameworks Underlying Portfolio Assessment
1. Constructivist Learning Theories
At the heart of portfolio assessment lies the foundation of constructivist learning theories. These theories posit that learners actively construct their knowledge and understanding of the world through interactions with their environment, peers, and experiences (Paris & Ayres, 1994). Portfolio assessment embraces this constructivist philosophy by encouraging students to select, organize, and reflect upon artifacts that represent their learning journey. This process enables learners to connect new knowledge with their existing mental frameworks, fostering deeper understanding and meaning-making (Black & Wiliam, 1998).
2. Authentic Assessment and Performance-Based Learning
Portfolio assessment is rooted in the principles of authentic assessment, which emphasizes evaluating students’ abilities and competencies in real-world contexts, mirroring the complexities of actual performance (Cambridge et al., 2001). Authentic assessment seeks to go beyond traditional testing paradigms by assessing not just what students know but also their ability to apply that knowledge in authentic situations. Portfolio assessment aligns with this perspective as it allows students to demonstrate their learning through the presentation of tangible evidence, offering a more comprehensive view of their abilities (Gonzalez & Kuenzi, 2012).
3. Reflective Practice and Metacognition
Portfolio assessment encourages reflective practice, a cornerstone of effective teaching and learning. By actively engaging students in the process of selecting and reflecting on their work, portfolios promote metacognition—the awareness and understanding of one’s own thinking processes (Paris & Ayres, 1994). Students are not only asked to showcase their work but also to articulate their learning experiences, challenges, and areas for improvement. This reflective aspect enhances their capacity for self-assessment, critical thinking, and goal setting, aligning with constructivist learning theories (Black & Wiliam, 1998).
C. How These Theories Inform Portfolio Assessment Practices
Constructivist learning theories underpin the very essence of portfolio assessment by emphasizing the active role of learners in constructing knowledge. Portfolio assessment embodies the idea that learners build their understanding by curating a collection of artifacts that reflect their learning journey. This process mirrors authentic assessment principles, which advocate for evaluating students’ abilities in contextually relevant situations. Through portfolio assessment, students are given the opportunity to showcase their knowledge, skills, and competencies in a manner that closely resembles real-world applications.
Reflective practice and metacognition are deeply embedded in portfolio assessment processes. As students engage in the reflective selection and presentation of artifacts, they are prompted to think critically about their learning experiences. This reflective component enhances metacognitive skills, fostering a deeper awareness of their own learning processes and the ability to set meaningful learning goals.
In summary, the theoretical foundations of constructivist learning theories, authentic assessment, and reflective practice collectively inform the design and implementation of portfolio assessment in school psychology. These theories underscore the importance of active engagement, real-world relevance, and reflective thinking in the assessment process, aligning portfolio assessment with progressive educational philosophies.
III. Designing and Implementing Portfolio Assessment
A. Planning and Creating Effective Portfolios
Portfolio assessment is a deliberate and systematic process that requires careful planning and thoughtful curation of artifacts to effectively gauge student progress and achievements. In this section, we delve into the key considerations for planning and creating portfolios that serve educational objectives effectively.
1. Setting Clear Objectives and Goals
Before embarking on portfolio creation, educators must establish clear learning objectives and goals that align with the curriculum and desired learning outcomes (Chiang & Chen, 2019). These objectives should guide the selection of artifacts and evidence that students will include in their portfolios. Objectives should be specific, measurable, and relevant to ensure that the portfolio assessment process is purposeful and aligned with educational goals.
2. Selecting Appropriate Artifacts and Evidence
The heart of a portfolio is its contents—the artifacts and evidence that students choose to include. Selecting these elements requires careful consideration to ensure that they align with the defined objectives and provide a comprehensive representation of the learner’s capabilities (Chang et al., 2018). Artifacts can include written assignments, projects, multimedia creations, and more. It is essential to strike a balance between variety and relevance, aiming for a well-rounded portrayal of the student’s growth and competencies.
3. Organizing Portfolios for Different Purposes
Portfolios can serve various purposes, such as assessment for learning, assessment of learning, and professional development (Chiang & Chen, 2019). Therefore, educators should consider the intended use of portfolios when designing them. For instance, formative assessment portfolios may prioritize ongoing reflection and feedback, while summative assessment portfolios may focus on showcasing a culmination of learning experiences. The organization and structure of portfolios should align with their intended purpose to maximize their effectiveness.
B. Portfolio Assessment Process
Creating portfolios is only the initial phase of the assessment process. This section outlines the key steps involved in the portfolio assessment process, from artifact collection to evaluation and scoring.
1. Collection of Artifacts
The portfolio assessment process commences with the collection of artifacts. Students should gather a diverse range of evidence that demonstrates their learning journey and accomplishments (Chang et al., 2018). This phase should be guided by the established objectives and goals, ensuring that selected artifacts align with the intended assessment outcomes.
2. Reflection and Self-Assessment
A pivotal aspect of portfolio assessment is the reflective component. Students are encouraged to engage in critical self-assessment and reflection on their learning experiences (Chiang & Chen, 2019). This reflective practice fosters metacognition, enabling students to gain insights into their strengths, weaknesses, and areas for growth. It encourages them to connect their learning experiences to broader educational goals.
3. Evaluation and Scoring
Portfolio assessment typically involves evaluation and scoring by educators or peers (Chang et al., 2018). Rubrics or scoring guides, aligned with the predetermined objectives, are often used to assess the quality and depth of portfolio contents. The evaluation process should be transparent and aligned with established criteria, ensuring fairness and consistency in assessment.
C. Benefits of Student Involvement in Portfolio Development
An integral aspect of portfolio assessment is engaging students in the development of their portfolios. This involvement offers several benefits that contribute to their educational growth and development.
1. Promoting Self-Regulated Learning
By actively selecting and reflecting on artifacts that represent their learning journey, students take ownership of their learning process (Chiang & Chen, 2019). This self-regulated learning fosters a sense of responsibility and autonomy, empowering students to set and pursue their learning goals. They become more aware of their strengths and areas for improvement, ultimately enhancing their metacognitive skills.
2. Fostering Ownership of Learning
Student involvement in portfolio development fosters a sense of ownership over their educational experiences (Chang et al., 2018). They become active participants in shaping their learning narratives, curating evidence of their achievements, and reflecting on their progress. This sense of ownership promotes intrinsic motivation, as students are more likely to engage deeply with their learning when they perceive themselves as active agents in their educational journey.
In conclusion, effective portfolio assessment involves careful planning and consideration of learning objectives, thoughtful curation of artifacts, and a structured assessment process. Engaging students in the portfolio development process not only enhances their metacognitive skills but also fosters a sense of ownership over their learning, contributing to their educational growth.
IV. Applications and Benefits of Portfolio Assessment
A. Portfolio Assessment in Educational Settings
Portfolio assessment plays a pivotal role in educational settings, offering a dynamic and multifaceted approach to evaluating student learning and growth. This section explores its applications and benefits in the realm of education.
1. Tracking Student Progress Over Time
One of the fundamental applications of portfolio assessment is its capacity to track student progress and development over an extended period (Chiang & Chen, 2019; Paulson, Paulson, & Meyer, 1991). Unlike traditional assessments that provide a snapshot of a student’s abilities at a particular moment, portfolios accumulate evidence of learning across time. This longitudinal perspective allows educators to gain insights into how students evolve academically, socially, and emotionally.
Portfolios serve as a repository of a student’s educational journey, showcasing not only the final outcomes but also the iterative process of learning. They document the evolution of skills, competencies, and self-awareness, providing a comprehensive picture of a student’s growth.
2. Enhancing Formative Assessment
Portfolio assessment excels in the realm of formative assessment, where the primary focus is on providing ongoing feedback to support learning (Chang et al., 2018; Darling-Hammond & Snyder, 2000). By regularly collecting artifacts and encouraging reflective practices, portfolios facilitate continuous feedback loops between students and educators. This iterative process allows for timely adjustments to instruction and learning strategies, ultimately enhancing student performance.
Formative portfolio assessment encourages metacognition and self-regulated learning as students actively engage in self-assessment and goal setting. It promotes a growth mindset, where mistakes and challenges are viewed as opportunities for improvement rather than failures.
B. Portfolio Assessment in Teacher Evaluation
Beyond its role in student assessment, portfolio assessment extends to evaluating teachers and their professional development. This section explores the applications and benefits of portfolio assessment in teacher evaluation.
1. Professional Development and Growth
Portfolio assessment serves as a valuable tool for teacher self-reflection and professional development (Chang et al., 2018; Darling-Hammond & Snyder, 2000). Educators can compile portfolios that document their teaching practices, strategies, and innovations. These portfolios offer a platform for teachers to reflect on their instructional methods, assess the effectiveness of various approaches, and identify areas for improvement.
Teacher portfolios often include evidence of lesson plans, instructional materials, student work samples, and reflections on classroom experiences. Through this process, educators gain a deeper understanding of their teaching philosophy and its alignment with educational goals.
2. Reflective Teaching Practices
The process of creating and maintaining a teaching portfolio fosters reflective teaching practices. Educators engage in critical self-assessment, considering the impact of their strategies on student learning outcomes (Chiang & Chen, 2019; Darling-Hammond & Snyder, 2000). They can identify successful teaching techniques and areas that may require adjustment.
Reflective teaching portfolios enable educators to set goals for their professional growth, integrating feedback from peer evaluations and student assessments. This reflective practice enhances the quality of teaching and contributes to an ongoing cycle of improvement.
C. Addressing Diverse Learners Through Portfolio Assessment
Portfolio assessment offers a flexible and inclusive approach that can effectively address the needs of diverse learners in educational settings.
1. Inclusivity and Equity in Assessment
Traditional assessments can sometimes inadvertently disadvantage students from diverse backgrounds, particularly those with linguistic or cultural differences (Wiliam, Lee, Harrison, & Black, 2004). Portfolio assessment provides an inclusive alternative, allowing students to demonstrate their learning in ways that align with their individual strengths and experiences.
Inclusivity and equity are fundamental principles of portfolio assessment. Students can select artifacts and evidence that resonate with their unique backgrounds, languages, and perspectives. This personalized approach respects and values diversity, ensuring that all students have a fair opportunity to showcase their capabilities.
2. Multilingual and Multicultural Considerations
Portfolio assessment is particularly valuable for multilingual and multicultural classrooms (O’Malley & Valdez Pierce, 1996). It accommodates students who may be more proficient in languages other than the dominant language of instruction. Multilingual students can use their portfolios to showcase their language skills and cultural competencies, enriching the educational experience for all.
Additionally, portfolios enable educators to gain deeper insights into the diverse cultural backgrounds of their students. This cultural awareness can inform instructional practices, making learning more relevant and engaging for all learners.
In summary, portfolio assessment offers versatile applications and a multitude of benefits in educational settings, from tracking student progress and enhancing formative assessment to fostering teacher reflection and inclusivity in assessment practices. Its flexibility and capacity to accommodate diverse learners make it a valuable tool in the educational landscape.
V. Challenges, Ethical Considerations, and Future Trends
A. Challenges and Limitations
While portfolio assessment offers numerous advantages, it also presents challenges and limitations that educators and school psychologists must navigate.
1. Time-Intensive Nature of Portfolio Assessment
Portfolio assessment demands a substantial investment of time and effort from both students and educators (Abrami et al., 2008; Wolf, 2010). Collecting, selecting, and organizing artifacts, coupled with reflective processes, can be time-consuming. This time commitment can pose challenges in busy educational environments where educators must balance multiple responsibilities.
Moreover, the time invested in portfolio assessment may be disproportionate to the outcomes achieved. Educators must carefully consider whether the benefits of this approach align with the resources available.
2. Standardization and Consistency
Maintaining consistency and standardization in portfolio assessment can be challenging (Chiang & Chen, 2019; Paulson, Paulson, & Meyer, 1991). Unlike traditional assessments with clear rubrics and scoring criteria, portfolio assessment often relies on subjective judgment. This subjectivity can lead to variability in evaluation, particularly when multiple assessors are involved.
Ensuring that the criteria for evaluating portfolios are well-defined and that assessors receive adequate training is crucial. Addressing this challenge requires ongoing efforts to enhance inter-rater reliability and validity in portfolio assessment practices.
B. Ethical Guidelines and Considerations
Ethical guidelines are integral to portfolio assessment to ensure that it upholds principles of fairness, privacy, and confidentiality (Abrami et al., 2008; Darling-Hammond & Snyder, 2000).
1. Maintaining Privacy and Confidentiality
Portfolio assessment may involve the inclusion of personal reflections, experiences, and sometimes sensitive content. Maintaining the privacy and confidentiality of students’ portfolios is of utmost importance. Educators and school psychologists must establish protocols to safeguard these documents (VanDerHeyden & Burns, 2008).
Moreover, ensuring that portfolio content is securely stored and accessible only to authorized individuals is essential. Consent from students or guardians should be obtained for sharing portfolios beyond the educational context.
2. Ensuring Fairness and Equity
Equity is a critical ethical consideration in portfolio assessment (Chiang & Chen, 2019; Wolf, 2010). Educators must be vigilant to prevent biases that may favor certain student populations over others. For instance, portfolios should be assessed based on learning objectives and competencies rather than individual characteristics.
To address this concern, it is essential to provide clear guidelines for assessing portfolios and training for assessors to minimize potential bias. Additionally, considering diverse learners’ needs and backgrounds when designing portfolio assessment tasks is vital.
C. Emerging Trends and Innovations in Portfolio Assessment
As technology continues to advance and educational practices evolve, portfolio assessment is also undergoing changes and innovations.
1. Digital Portfolios and E-Portfolios
The advent of digital portfolios, or e-portfolios, has revolutionized the portfolio assessment landscape (Chang et al., 2018; Overbay, Molloy, & Kimberly, 2018). E-portfolios enable students to compile and present their work in digital formats, incorporating multimedia elements such as videos, images, and hyperlinks.
Digital portfolios offer several advantages, including ease of access, the ability to hyperlink evidence to learning outcomes, and streamlined assessment processes. They also facilitate collaborative and asynchronous feedback, enhancing the learning experience.
2. Integration with Other Assessment Methods
Portfolio assessment is increasingly integrated with other assessment methods, creating a more comprehensive approach to evaluating student learning (Hamp-Lyons & Condon, 2000; Paulson, Paulson, & Meyer, 1991). Educators combine portfolio assessment with standardized testing, classroom observations, and other formative and summative assessment tools to gain a holistic perspective of student progress.
This integrated approach aligns with the broader shift in educational assessment practices toward a balanced assessment system. It acknowledges that no single assessment method can capture the complexity of student learning and development.
In conclusion, portfolio assessment, while offering numerous benefits, presents challenges related to time constraints and maintaining consistency. Ethical considerations, including privacy, confidentiality, and equity, are paramount. Emerging trends, such as digital portfolios and integration with other assessment methods, are shaping the future of portfolio assessment, enhancing its utility in school psychology and education.
VI. Conclusion
A. Summary of Key Points Discussed in the Article
Portfolio assessment is a multifaceted and dynamic approach to evaluating student learning and achievement. Throughout this article, we have explored the theoretical foundations, design and implementation, applications and benefits, challenges, ethical considerations, and future trends associated with portfolio assessment in school psychology and educational settings.
The theoretical underpinnings of portfolio assessment draw from constructivist learning theories, emphasizing the active role of students in constructing knowledge and understanding. Authentic assessment principles and reflective practice align portfolio assessment with real-world contexts, promoting deeper learning and metacognition.
In designing and implementing portfolio assessment, clear objectives and goals must guide the process. The selection and organization of artifacts, coupled with student involvement in the development of their portfolios, are essential components. Portfolio assessment serves various purposes, including tracking student progress over time, enhancing formative assessment practices, and supporting teacher professional growth.
While portfolio assessment offers significant benefits, it also presents challenges such as the time-intensive nature of the process and the need for standardization. Ethical considerations are paramount, ensuring privacy, confidentiality, and equitable assessment practices.
Emerging trends in portfolio assessment, including digital portfolios (e-portfolios) and integration with other assessment methods, hold promise for enhancing its utility and relevance in educational contexts.
B. Continued Significance and Relevance of Portfolio Assessment in School Psychology
In the ever-evolving landscape of educational assessment, portfolio assessment stands as a powerful tool for capturing the depth and breadth of student learning. It accommodates diverse learning styles, fosters student engagement, and encourages reflective practice. Furthermore, its alignment with constructivist and authentic learning theories positions it as an approach that resonates with contemporary educational philosophies.
Portfolio assessment not only serves students but also supports educators and school psychologists. It offers a means to gain insights into individual student progress and development while facilitating professional growth and reflective teaching practices. By promoting a student-centered approach to assessment, portfolio assessment aligns with the broader goals of education to empower learners and prepare them for the challenges of the future.
As we move forward in the field of school psychology and education, the continued significance and relevance of portfolio assessment are clear. Its evolution, incorporating digital formats and integrating with other assessment methods, ensures its adaptability to changing educational landscapes. Portfolio assessment’s enduring value lies in its capacity to provide a comprehensive view of student growth, foster reflective practice, and contribute to meaningful, student-centered learning experiences.
In conclusion, portfolio assessment is not merely a collection of artifacts but a testament to the journey of learning. It captures the essence of growth, development, and the acquisition of knowledge and skills. As educators and school psychologists embrace the opportunities and challenges of portfolio assessment, they contribute to the holistic development of students and the advancement of education.
References:
- Abrami, P. C., Barrett, H., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2008). Benefits of technology use in the classroom: Three decades of research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1-47.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
- Cambridge, D., Cambridge, B. L., & Yancey, K. B. (2001). Electronic portfolios: Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional learning. American Association for Higher Education.
- Chang, C. C., Wu, C. H., & Hsu, W. H. (2018). Enhancing high school students’ self-regulation and deep learning strategies in an engineering design project through portfolio assessment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 17-29.
- Chiang, S. Y., & Chen, Y. Y. (2019). Portfolio assessment as an alternative assessment tool: Its impact on Taiwanese college students’ learning achievements, attitudes, and critical thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 275-288.
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 523-545.
- Gonzalez, M. D., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). The role of e-portfolios in enhancing learning: A study of student perceptions. International Journal of ePortfolio, 2(2), 97-108.
- Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory, and research. Hampton Press.
- O’Malley, J. M., & Valdez Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. Addison-Wesley.
- Overbay, A., Molloy, E. M., & Kimberly, A. (2018). Supporting student learning: The use of e-portfolios in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 43(3), 171-184.
- Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60-63.
- Paris, S. G., & Ayres, L. R. (1994). Becoming reflective students and teachers. American Psychological Association.
- VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Burns, M. K. (2008). Assessment for effective intervention: Best practices for the role of the school psychologist. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33(1), 6-12.
- Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49-65.
- Wolf, D. P. (2010). Portfolio assessment: Sampling student work. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(2), 15-18.